YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Prediction of Failure Behavior of a Welded Pressure Vessel Containing Flaws During a Hydrogen-Charged Burst Test

    Source: Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology:;1999:;volume( 121 ):;issue: 003::page 246
    Author:
    G. S. Bhuyan
    ,
    E. J. Sperling
    ,
    G. Shen
    ,
    H. Yin
    ,
    M. D. Rana
    DOI: 10.1115/1.2883699
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: An industry-government collaborative program was carried out with an aim to promoting the acceptance of fracture mechanics-based fitness-for-service assessment methodology for a service-damaged pressure vessel. A collaborative round robin exercise was carried out to predict the fracture behavior of a vessel containing hydrogen damage, fabrication-related lack-of-fusion defects, an artificially induced fatigue crack, and a localized thinned area. The fracture assessment procedures used include the U.S. ASME Material Property Council’s PREFIS Program based on the British Standard (BS) Published Document (PD) 6493, ASME Section XI and The Central Electricity Generating Board (CEGB) R6 approach, The Welding Institute (TWI) CRACKWISE program (based on BS PD6493 Level 2 approach), a variant of the R6 approach, J -tearing instability approaches, various J -estimation schemes, LEFM approach, and simplified stress analysis. Assessments were compared with the results obtained from a hydrogen-charged burst test of the vessel. Predictions, based on the J -tearing approach, compared well with the actual burst test results. Actual burst pressure was about five times the operating pressure.
    keyword(s): Pressure vessels , Failure , Hydrogen , Fracture (Process) , Vessels , Pressure , Welding , Product quality , Manufacturing , Fatigue cracks , Stress analysis (Engineering) , Materials properties , Fitness-for-service AND Governments ,
    • Download: (833.8Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Prediction of Failure Behavior of a Welded Pressure Vessel Containing Flaws During a Hydrogen-Charged Burst Test

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/122715
    Collections
    • Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology

    Show full item record

    contributor authorG. S. Bhuyan
    contributor authorE. J. Sperling
    contributor authorG. Shen
    contributor authorH. Yin
    contributor authorM. D. Rana
    date accessioned2017-05-09T00:00:39Z
    date available2017-05-09T00:00:39Z
    date copyrightAugust, 1999
    date issued1999
    identifier issn0094-9930
    identifier otherJPVTAS-28392#246_1.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/122715
    description abstractAn industry-government collaborative program was carried out with an aim to promoting the acceptance of fracture mechanics-based fitness-for-service assessment methodology for a service-damaged pressure vessel. A collaborative round robin exercise was carried out to predict the fracture behavior of a vessel containing hydrogen damage, fabrication-related lack-of-fusion defects, an artificially induced fatigue crack, and a localized thinned area. The fracture assessment procedures used include the U.S. ASME Material Property Council’s PREFIS Program based on the British Standard (BS) Published Document (PD) 6493, ASME Section XI and The Central Electricity Generating Board (CEGB) R6 approach, The Welding Institute (TWI) CRACKWISE program (based on BS PD6493 Level 2 approach), a variant of the R6 approach, J -tearing instability approaches, various J -estimation schemes, LEFM approach, and simplified stress analysis. Assessments were compared with the results obtained from a hydrogen-charged burst test of the vessel. Predictions, based on the J -tearing approach, compared well with the actual burst test results. Actual burst pressure was about five times the operating pressure.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titlePrediction of Failure Behavior of a Welded Pressure Vessel Containing Flaws During a Hydrogen-Charged Burst Test
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume121
    journal issue3
    journal titleJournal of Pressure Vessel Technology
    identifier doi10.1115/1.2883699
    journal fristpage246
    journal lastpage251
    identifier eissn1528-8978
    keywordsPressure vessels
    keywordsFailure
    keywordsHydrogen
    keywordsFracture (Process)
    keywordsVessels
    keywordsPressure
    keywordsWelding
    keywordsProduct quality
    keywordsManufacturing
    keywordsFatigue cracks
    keywordsStress analysis (Engineering)
    keywordsMaterials properties
    keywordsFitness-for-service AND Governments
    treeJournal of Pressure Vessel Technology:;1999:;volume( 121 ):;issue: 003
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian