YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Dimensional Measurement Data Analysis, Part 2: Minimum Zone Evaluation

    Source: Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering:;1999:;volume( 121 ):;issue: 002::page 246
    Author:
    W. Choi
    ,
    T. R. Kurfess
    DOI: 10.1115/1.2831212
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: Modern inspection systems such as coordinate measurement machines generate discrete three dimensional coordinates representing points from the surface of a manufactured part. These coordinates must be compared to a target or nominal geometry to determine if the part conforms to specification. Quite often a least squares fit or a min-max fit are employed to determine the part geometry. However, as described in Part 1 of this paper, acceptable deviations are often specified as tolerance zones about the nominal geometry. Part 1 of this paper presents a zone fitting algorithm having an objective of placing the sampled data points within a specified tolerance zone. If all of the points fit within the zone, the part is passed. This pass/fail result does not provide information as to the quality of the part. The question that is not answered is “Did the points just fit into the tolerance zone, or did the points fit with ample space remaining?” This question is important as it informs production personnel whether their processes are operating well within specifications or just barely within specifications. In this part of the paper, the zone fitting method developed in Part 1 of this paper is extended to a minimum zone evaluation. This can be formulated as a one dimensional search for the critical value of the zone fitting objective function. The minimum zone evaluation algorithm developed in this paper can be applied to an arbitrary geometry profile evaluation. A number of examples are presented to demonstrate its capabilities.
    keyword(s): Machinery , Inspection , Algorithms , Fittings AND Geometry ,
    • Download: (532.6Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Dimensional Measurement Data Analysis, Part 2: Minimum Zone Evaluation

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/122508
    Collections
    • Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorW. Choi
    contributor authorT. R. Kurfess
    date accessioned2017-05-09T00:00:18Z
    date available2017-05-09T00:00:18Z
    date copyrightMay, 1999
    date issued1999
    identifier issn1087-1357
    identifier otherJMSEFK-27342#246_1.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/122508
    description abstractModern inspection systems such as coordinate measurement machines generate discrete three dimensional coordinates representing points from the surface of a manufactured part. These coordinates must be compared to a target or nominal geometry to determine if the part conforms to specification. Quite often a least squares fit or a min-max fit are employed to determine the part geometry. However, as described in Part 1 of this paper, acceptable deviations are often specified as tolerance zones about the nominal geometry. Part 1 of this paper presents a zone fitting algorithm having an objective of placing the sampled data points within a specified tolerance zone. If all of the points fit within the zone, the part is passed. This pass/fail result does not provide information as to the quality of the part. The question that is not answered is “Did the points just fit into the tolerance zone, or did the points fit with ample space remaining?” This question is important as it informs production personnel whether their processes are operating well within specifications or just barely within specifications. In this part of the paper, the zone fitting method developed in Part 1 of this paper is extended to a minimum zone evaluation. This can be formulated as a one dimensional search for the critical value of the zone fitting objective function. The minimum zone evaluation algorithm developed in this paper can be applied to an arbitrary geometry profile evaluation. A number of examples are presented to demonstrate its capabilities.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleDimensional Measurement Data Analysis, Part 2: Minimum Zone Evaluation
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume121
    journal issue2
    journal titleJournal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering
    identifier doi10.1115/1.2831212
    journal fristpage246
    journal lastpage250
    identifier eissn1528-8935
    keywordsMachinery
    keywordsInspection
    keywordsAlgorithms
    keywordsFittings AND Geometry
    treeJournal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering:;1999:;volume( 121 ):;issue: 002
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian