YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Fluids Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Fluids Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Review: Diffuser Design and Performance Analysis by a Unified Integral Method

    Source: Journal of Fluids Engineering:;1998:;volume( 120 ):;issue: 001::page 6
    Author:
    J. P. Johnston
    DOI: 10.1115/1.2819663
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: A computational tool, called a Unified Integral Method (UIM) is reviewed. The method is used for preliminary design and performance analysis of simple diffusers with thin inlet boundary layers and subsonic flow in their inviscid core regions. The assumptions needed for application of a UIM are not very restrictive in many practical cases: straight diffusers with thin, turbulent inlet boundary layers and subsonic, irrotational core flows. The method provides designers with useful results including pressure recovery, location of separation and stalled regions, and exit plane profiles which may be used to evaluate total pressure loss and various flow distortion indices. Besides reviewing some basic concepts concerning stall and separation, describing the basis of the method and some details for making the UIM work, actual cases where it was tested versus data are discussed. In addition, UIM results are compared to results obtained by a RANS method run in a well known duct flow solver for a subsonic diffuser where data are also available. In another case, its output and data were compared to results from a CFD code typical of the many design codes in use in industry today. In both cases, the UIM results were as good, or better than those from the higher level methods, and the UIM is much simpler and easier to use as a design tool.
    keyword(s): Diffusers , Design , Flow (Dynamics) , Separation (Technology) , Boundary layers , Pressure , Computational fluid dynamics , Turbulence , Ducts , Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes equations AND Subsonic flow ,
    • Download: (1.524Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Review: Diffuser Design and Performance Analysis by a Unified Integral Method

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/120666
    Collections
    • Journal of Fluids Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorJ. P. Johnston
    date accessioned2017-05-08T23:57:00Z
    date available2017-05-08T23:57:00Z
    date copyrightMarch, 1998
    date issued1998
    identifier issn0098-2202
    identifier otherJFEGA4-27126#6_1.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/120666
    description abstractA computational tool, called a Unified Integral Method (UIM) is reviewed. The method is used for preliminary design and performance analysis of simple diffusers with thin inlet boundary layers and subsonic flow in their inviscid core regions. The assumptions needed for application of a UIM are not very restrictive in many practical cases: straight diffusers with thin, turbulent inlet boundary layers and subsonic, irrotational core flows. The method provides designers with useful results including pressure recovery, location of separation and stalled regions, and exit plane profiles which may be used to evaluate total pressure loss and various flow distortion indices. Besides reviewing some basic concepts concerning stall and separation, describing the basis of the method and some details for making the UIM work, actual cases where it was tested versus data are discussed. In addition, UIM results are compared to results obtained by a RANS method run in a well known duct flow solver for a subsonic diffuser where data are also available. In another case, its output and data were compared to results from a CFD code typical of the many design codes in use in industry today. In both cases, the UIM results were as good, or better than those from the higher level methods, and the UIM is much simpler and easier to use as a design tool.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleReview: Diffuser Design and Performance Analysis by a Unified Integral Method
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume120
    journal issue1
    journal titleJournal of Fluids Engineering
    identifier doi10.1115/1.2819663
    journal fristpage6
    journal lastpage18
    identifier eissn1528-901X
    keywordsDiffusers
    keywordsDesign
    keywordsFlow (Dynamics)
    keywordsSeparation (Technology)
    keywordsBoundary layers
    keywordsPressure
    keywordsComputational fluid dynamics
    keywordsTurbulence
    keywordsDucts
    keywordsReynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes equations AND Subsonic flow
    treeJournal of Fluids Engineering:;1998:;volume( 120 ):;issue: 001
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian