YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Fluids Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Fluids Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Perspective: Flow at High Reynolds Number and Over Rough Surfaces—Achilles Heel of CFD

    Source: Journal of Fluids Engineering:;1998:;volume( 120 ):;issue: 003::page 434
    Author:
    V. C. Patel
    DOI: 10.1115/1.2820682
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: The law of the wall and related correlations underpin much of current computational fluid dynamics (CFD) software, either directly through use of so-called wall functions or indirectly in near-wall turbulence models. The correlations for near-wall flow become crucial in solution of two problems of great practical importance, namely, in prediction of flow at high Reynolds numbers and in modeling the effects of surface roughness. Although the two problems may appear vastly different from a physical point of view, they share common numerical features. Some results from the ’superpipe’ experiment at Princeton University are analyzed along with those of previous experiments on the boundary layer on an axisymmetric body to identify features of near-wall flow at high Reynolds numbers that are useful in modeling. The study is complemented by a review of some computations in simple and complex flows to reveal the strengths and weaknesses of turbulence models used in modern CFD methods. Similarly, principal results of classical experiments on the effects of sand-grain roughness are reviewed, along with various models proposed to account for these effects in numerical solutions. Models that claim to resolve the near-wall flow are applied to the flow in rough-wall pipes and channels to illustrate their power and limitations. The need for further laboratory and numerical experiments is clarified as a result of this study.
    keyword(s): Reynolds number , Surface roughness , Computational fluid dynamics , Flow (Dynamics) , Turbulence , Modeling , Pipes , Computation , Computer software , Functions , Underpinning , Boundary layers , Sands AND Channels (Hydraulic engineering) ,
    • Download: (1.481Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Perspective: Flow at High Reynolds Number and Over Rough Surfaces—Achilles Heel of CFD

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/120600
    Collections
    • Journal of Fluids Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorV. C. Patel
    date accessioned2017-05-08T23:56:55Z
    date available2017-05-08T23:56:55Z
    date copyrightSeptember, 1998
    date issued1998
    identifier issn0098-2202
    identifier otherJFEGA4-27132#434_1.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/120600
    description abstractThe law of the wall and related correlations underpin much of current computational fluid dynamics (CFD) software, either directly through use of so-called wall functions or indirectly in near-wall turbulence models. The correlations for near-wall flow become crucial in solution of two problems of great practical importance, namely, in prediction of flow at high Reynolds numbers and in modeling the effects of surface roughness. Although the two problems may appear vastly different from a physical point of view, they share common numerical features. Some results from the ’superpipe’ experiment at Princeton University are analyzed along with those of previous experiments on the boundary layer on an axisymmetric body to identify features of near-wall flow at high Reynolds numbers that are useful in modeling. The study is complemented by a review of some computations in simple and complex flows to reveal the strengths and weaknesses of turbulence models used in modern CFD methods. Similarly, principal results of classical experiments on the effects of sand-grain roughness are reviewed, along with various models proposed to account for these effects in numerical solutions. Models that claim to resolve the near-wall flow are applied to the flow in rough-wall pipes and channels to illustrate their power and limitations. The need for further laboratory and numerical experiments is clarified as a result of this study.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titlePerspective: Flow at High Reynolds Number and Over Rough Surfaces—Achilles Heel of CFD
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume120
    journal issue3
    journal titleJournal of Fluids Engineering
    identifier doi10.1115/1.2820682
    journal fristpage434
    journal lastpage444
    identifier eissn1528-901X
    keywordsReynolds number
    keywordsSurface roughness
    keywordsComputational fluid dynamics
    keywordsFlow (Dynamics)
    keywordsTurbulence
    keywordsModeling
    keywordsPipes
    keywordsComputation
    keywordsComputer software
    keywordsFunctions
    keywordsUnderpinning
    keywordsBoundary layers
    keywordsSands AND Channels (Hydraulic engineering)
    treeJournal of Fluids Engineering:;1998:;volume( 120 ):;issue: 003
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian