A New Look at Measurement Uncertainty of Multiphase Flow MetersSource: Journal of Energy Resources Technology:;1998:;volume( 120 ):;issue: 001::page 56Author:G. E. Kouba
DOI: 10.1115/1.2795010Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
Abstract: At present, no standard of presenting multiphase flow meter (MPFM) uncertainties has been accepted by industry. Consequently, vendors’ specifications may only indicate velocity and component fraction uncertainties, while customers will typically need to know the overall uncertainty of the hydrocarbon (gas or oil) flow rate. Moreover, comparisons between different meters, meter locations, and metering strategies are difficult without the combined uncertainties of the hydrocarbon measurement. A simple uncertainty analysis (UA) is presented as a means of combining individual measurement uncertainties to determine an overall uncertainty for one of the mixture components, e.g., oil rate. The results are displayed as contour lines of constant oil rate uncertainty on plots of gas fraction versus water cut. Examples illustrate how the uncertainty of oil rate measurement might be reduced by operating the meter at higher pressure, or employing partial separation strategies, and limitations of such strategies.
keyword(s): Multiphase flow , Measurement uncertainty , Uncertainty , Mixtures , Water , Pressure , Flow (Dynamics) AND Separation (Technology) ,
|
Collections
Show full item record
contributor author | G. E. Kouba | |
date accessioned | 2017-05-08T23:56:26Z | |
date available | 2017-05-08T23:56:26Z | |
date copyright | March, 1998 | |
date issued | 1998 | |
identifier issn | 0195-0738 | |
identifier other | JERTD2-26475#56_1.pdf | |
identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/120344 | |
description abstract | At present, no standard of presenting multiphase flow meter (MPFM) uncertainties has been accepted by industry. Consequently, vendors’ specifications may only indicate velocity and component fraction uncertainties, while customers will typically need to know the overall uncertainty of the hydrocarbon (gas or oil) flow rate. Moreover, comparisons between different meters, meter locations, and metering strategies are difficult without the combined uncertainties of the hydrocarbon measurement. A simple uncertainty analysis (UA) is presented as a means of combining individual measurement uncertainties to determine an overall uncertainty for one of the mixture components, e.g., oil rate. The results are displayed as contour lines of constant oil rate uncertainty on plots of gas fraction versus water cut. Examples illustrate how the uncertainty of oil rate measurement might be reduced by operating the meter at higher pressure, or employing partial separation strategies, and limitations of such strategies. | |
publisher | The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) | |
title | A New Look at Measurement Uncertainty of Multiphase Flow Meters | |
type | Journal Paper | |
journal volume | 120 | |
journal issue | 1 | |
journal title | Journal of Energy Resources Technology | |
identifier doi | 10.1115/1.2795010 | |
journal fristpage | 56 | |
journal lastpage | 60 | |
identifier eissn | 1528-8994 | |
keywords | Multiphase flow | |
keywords | Measurement uncertainty | |
keywords | Uncertainty | |
keywords | Mixtures | |
keywords | Water | |
keywords | Pressure | |
keywords | Flow (Dynamics) AND Separation (Technology) | |
tree | Journal of Energy Resources Technology:;1998:;volume( 120 ):;issue: 001 | |
contenttype | Fulltext |