The Accuracy of Digital Image-Based Finite Element ModelsSource: Journal of Biomechanical Engineering:;1998:;volume( 120 ):;issue: 002::page 289DOI: 10.1115/1.2798314Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
Abstract: Digital image-based finite element meshing is an alternative approach to time-consuming conventional meshing techniques for generating realistic three-dimensional (3D) models of complex structures. Although not limited to biological applications, digital image-based modeling has been used to generate structure-specific (i.e., nongeneric) models of whole bones and trabecular bone microstructures. However, questions remain regarding the solution accuracy provided by the digital meshing approach, particularly at model or material boundaries. The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of digital and conventional smooth boundary models based on theoretical solutions for a two-dimensional (2D) compression plate and a 3D circular cantilever beam. For both the plate and beam analyses, the predicted solution at digital model boundaries was characterized by local oscillations, which produced potentially high errors within individual boundary elements. Significantly, however, the digital model boundary solution oscillated approximately about the theoretical solution. A marked improvement in solution accuracy was therefore achieved by considering average results within a region composed of several elements. Absolute errors for Von Mises stress averaged over the beam cross section, for example, converged to less than 4 percent, and the predicted free-end displacement of the cantilever beam was within 1 percent of the theoretical solution. Analyses at several beam orientations and mesh resolutions suggested a minimum discretization of three to four digital finite elements through the beam cross section to avoid high numerical stiffening errors under bending.
keyword(s): Oscillations , Cantilever beams , Stress , Bone , Boundary element methods , Finite element analysis , Modeling , Compression , Displacement , Errors AND Finite element model ,
|
Collections
Show full item record
| contributor author | R. E. Guldberg | |
| contributor author | S. J. Hollister | |
| contributor author | G. T. Charras | |
| date accessioned | 2017-05-08T23:56:02Z | |
| date available | 2017-05-08T23:56:02Z | |
| date copyright | April, 1998 | |
| date issued | 1998 | |
| identifier issn | 0148-0731 | |
| identifier other | JBENDY-25991#289_1.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/120105 | |
| description abstract | Digital image-based finite element meshing is an alternative approach to time-consuming conventional meshing techniques for generating realistic three-dimensional (3D) models of complex structures. Although not limited to biological applications, digital image-based modeling has been used to generate structure-specific (i.e., nongeneric) models of whole bones and trabecular bone microstructures. However, questions remain regarding the solution accuracy provided by the digital meshing approach, particularly at model or material boundaries. The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of digital and conventional smooth boundary models based on theoretical solutions for a two-dimensional (2D) compression plate and a 3D circular cantilever beam. For both the plate and beam analyses, the predicted solution at digital model boundaries was characterized by local oscillations, which produced potentially high errors within individual boundary elements. Significantly, however, the digital model boundary solution oscillated approximately about the theoretical solution. A marked improvement in solution accuracy was therefore achieved by considering average results within a region composed of several elements. Absolute errors for Von Mises stress averaged over the beam cross section, for example, converged to less than 4 percent, and the predicted free-end displacement of the cantilever beam was within 1 percent of the theoretical solution. Analyses at several beam orientations and mesh resolutions suggested a minimum discretization of three to four digital finite elements through the beam cross section to avoid high numerical stiffening errors under bending. | |
| publisher | The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) | |
| title | The Accuracy of Digital Image-Based Finite Element Models | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 120 | |
| journal issue | 2 | |
| journal title | Journal of Biomechanical Engineering | |
| identifier doi | 10.1115/1.2798314 | |
| journal fristpage | 289 | |
| journal lastpage | 295 | |
| identifier eissn | 1528-8951 | |
| keywords | Oscillations | |
| keywords | Cantilever beams | |
| keywords | Stress | |
| keywords | Bone | |
| keywords | Boundary element methods | |
| keywords | Finite element analysis | |
| keywords | Modeling | |
| keywords | Compression | |
| keywords | Displacement | |
| keywords | Errors AND Finite element model | |
| tree | Journal of Biomechanical Engineering:;1998:;volume( 120 ):;issue: 002 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext |