| contributor author | M. Rupert | |
| contributor author | E. Grood | |
| contributor author | T. Byczkowski | |
| contributor author | M. Levy | |
| date accessioned | 2017-05-08T23:55:50Z | |
| date available | 2017-05-08T23:55:50Z | |
| date copyright | December, 1998 | |
| date issued | 1998 | |
| identifier issn | 0148-0731 | |
| identifier other | JBENDY-26007#764_1.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/120018 | |
| description abstract | In-vivo tendon forces are commonly measured using transducers, which detect tension in the tendon fibers. A poorly understood source of measurement errors is the difference in stress distribution within the tendon between experimental and transducer calibration conditions. The objective of this study was to investigate this source of error, and to determine whether these errors could be minimized by proper selection of transducer size. The study was conducted using the infrapatellar ligament (patellar tendon) of New Zealand White rabbits. Tendon force was measured with two different size implantable force transducers (IFTs), one Wide and one Narrow, and by a strain gaged load cell in series with the tendon. Tests were conducted at five different loading conditions selected to produce five different stress distributions within the tendon. One loading condition corresponded to a typical post-experiment calibration, and the data from that condition were used to develop a calibration equation for the transducer. The errors that resulted from using this calibration were determined by comparing the tendon force measured by the in-series load cell with the force predicted from the IFT output using the calibration equation. Changes in stress distribution produced measurement errors up to 64 N with the Narrow IFT but only 24 N with the Wide IFT. We found the measurement error was dependent on sensor width. Our results support the hypothesis that measurement errors can be caused by differences in tendon stress distribution between calibration and experimental conditions. We further showed that these errors can be minimized by using an IFT, which samples the tension in a large percentage of the tendon fibers. Information from this study can be used for selection of an appropriately sized implantable force transducer for measuring tendon and ligament force. | |
| publisher | The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) | |
| title | Influence of Sensor Size on the Accuracy of In-Vivo Ligament and Tendon Force Measurements | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 120 | |
| journal issue | 6 | |
| journal title | Journal of Biomechanical Engineering | |
| identifier doi | 10.1115/1.2834891 | |
| journal fristpage | 764 | |
| journal lastpage | 769 | |
| identifier eissn | 1528-8951 | |
| keywords | Sensors | |
| keywords | Force measurement | |
| keywords | Tendons | |
| keywords | Errors | |
| keywords | Force | |
| keywords | Transducers | |
| keywords | Calibration | |
| keywords | Stress | |
| keywords | Stress concentration | |
| keywords | Fibers | |
| keywords | Equations AND Tension | |
| tree | Journal of Biomechanical Engineering:;1998:;volume( 120 ):;issue: 006 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext | |