YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Applied Mechanics Reviews
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Applied Mechanics Reviews
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Three Versions of the Finite Element Method Based on Concepts of Either Stochasticity, Fuzziness, or Anti-Optimization

    Source: Applied Mechanics Reviews:;1998:;volume( 051 ):;issue: 003::page 209
    Author:
    Isaac Elishakoff
    DOI: 10.1115/1.3098998
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: In this review article, we describe in some detail three versions of the FEM pertinent to the uncertainty triangle, introduced by the present writer; in particular, to describe various types of uncertainties in the structure, namely a) non-perturbational finite element method for stochastic structures, b) finite element method associated with determination of least favorable responses through the method of anti-optimization in interval setting of parameters, and c) finite element method based on the fuzzy sets. The comparison between the probabilistic and convex modeling of uncertainty is conducted. The combined optimization and anti-optimization due to presence uncertainty is advocated. The author trusts that hybrid approaches, rather than a) genuine probabilistic treatment, b) anti-optimization, or c) fuzzy-sets-based modeling are called for to rigorously treat the realistic structures. In the end, the issue of relative robustness of these approaches is discussed. This review should be viewed as a continuation of our previous essays about non-probabilistic modeling of uncertainty, random vibrations, and introduction of initial imperfection-sensitivity concept into design, respectively (Comput Struct, 1995; Appl Mech Rev, 1995; NASA SP, 1998; Comput Meth in Appl Mech Eng, with Ren YJ, 1998), devoted to various aspects of uncertainty modeling in engineering. As its predecessors, it contains personal perspectives on the subject. It is envisioned, that at a later stage, these reviews, combined, will be published as a book, Thoughts on Uncertainty. This review article contains 126 references.
    keyword(s): Optimization , Finite element methods , Uncertainty , Modeling , Design , Random vibration , Finite element model AND Robustness ,
    • Download: (1.264Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Three Versions of the Finite Element Method Based on Concepts of Either Stochasticity, Fuzziness, or Anti-Optimization

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/119801
    Collections
    • Applied Mechanics Reviews

    Show full item record

    contributor authorIsaac Elishakoff
    date accessioned2017-05-08T23:55:26Z
    date available2017-05-08T23:55:26Z
    date copyrightMarch, 1998
    date issued1998
    identifier issn0003-6900
    identifier otherAMREAD-25746#209_1.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/119801
    description abstractIn this review article, we describe in some detail three versions of the FEM pertinent to the uncertainty triangle, introduced by the present writer; in particular, to describe various types of uncertainties in the structure, namely a) non-perturbational finite element method for stochastic structures, b) finite element method associated with determination of least favorable responses through the method of anti-optimization in interval setting of parameters, and c) finite element method based on the fuzzy sets. The comparison between the probabilistic and convex modeling of uncertainty is conducted. The combined optimization and anti-optimization due to presence uncertainty is advocated. The author trusts that hybrid approaches, rather than a) genuine probabilistic treatment, b) anti-optimization, or c) fuzzy-sets-based modeling are called for to rigorously treat the realistic structures. In the end, the issue of relative robustness of these approaches is discussed. This review should be viewed as a continuation of our previous essays about non-probabilistic modeling of uncertainty, random vibrations, and introduction of initial imperfection-sensitivity concept into design, respectively (Comput Struct, 1995; Appl Mech Rev, 1995; NASA SP, 1998; Comput Meth in Appl Mech Eng, with Ren YJ, 1998), devoted to various aspects of uncertainty modeling in engineering. As its predecessors, it contains personal perspectives on the subject. It is envisioned, that at a later stage, these reviews, combined, will be published as a book, Thoughts on Uncertainty. This review article contains 126 references.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleThree Versions of the Finite Element Method Based on Concepts of Either Stochasticity, Fuzziness, or Anti-Optimization
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume51
    journal issue3
    journal titleApplied Mechanics Reviews
    identifier doi10.1115/1.3098998
    journal fristpage209
    journal lastpage218
    identifier eissn0003-6900
    keywordsOptimization
    keywordsFinite element methods
    keywordsUncertainty
    keywordsModeling
    keywordsDesign
    keywordsRandom vibration
    keywordsFinite element model AND Robustness
    treeApplied Mechanics Reviews:;1998:;volume( 051 ):;issue: 003
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian