A Re-Examination of Propane Tank Tub Rockets Including Field Trial ResultsSource: Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology:;1997:;volume( 119 ):;issue: 003::page 356DOI: 10.1115/1.2842316Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
Abstract: When a tank containing a pressure-liquefied gas fails, one mode of failure involves the tank being propelled large distances by the released two-phase material. This mode of failure is called a tub rocket and it can pose a severe hazard to the public because of its unpredictability. Field tests were recently conducted to study the effect of explosive devices on propane tanks. The tests included tanks of various sizes up to 2000 L (500 gal).In most cases, the tests resulted in punctured tanks with transient two-phase jet releases. In some cases, the jet releases were sufficient to propel the tanks over considerable distances. In a small number of tests involving 470-L tanks, the explosive device resulted in the clean removal of a tank end, and this resulted in near-ideal launches of tub rockets. In one case, the rocket was launched vertically, and in another, the rocket was launched near 45 deg elevation angle giving a tub range of 370 m. In other cases, the explosive devices resulted in punctures, and in some of these, the resulting two-phase jet propelled the tanks over considerable distance. These examples gave a good opportunity to re-examine tub rocket models for tanks containing liquefied gases. This paper describes a theoretical model involving two-phase critical flow propulsion of cylindrical tanks. Three different critical flow models are compared, including the homogeneous equilibrium model (HEM), the homogeneous frozen model (HFM), and the Henry-Fauske model (HFK). Range predictions are compared with existing data and a model previously developed. Model predictions are calibrated to the field trial results described in the foregoing and then used to predict realistic ranges for various sizes of storage and transport tanks.
keyword(s): Rockets , Explosives , Failure , Flow (Dynamics) , Gases , Propulsion , Equilibrium (Physics) , Pressure , Storage AND Transport Tank Code ,
|
Collections
Show full item record
contributor author | T. Miller | |
contributor author | A. M. Birk | |
date accessioned | 2017-05-08T23:54:29Z | |
date available | 2017-05-08T23:54:29Z | |
date copyright | August, 1997 | |
date issued | 1997 | |
identifier issn | 0094-9930 | |
identifier other | JPVTAS-28378#356_1.pdf | |
identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/119259 | |
description abstract | When a tank containing a pressure-liquefied gas fails, one mode of failure involves the tank being propelled large distances by the released two-phase material. This mode of failure is called a tub rocket and it can pose a severe hazard to the public because of its unpredictability. Field tests were recently conducted to study the effect of explosive devices on propane tanks. The tests included tanks of various sizes up to 2000 L (500 gal).In most cases, the tests resulted in punctured tanks with transient two-phase jet releases. In some cases, the jet releases were sufficient to propel the tanks over considerable distances. In a small number of tests involving 470-L tanks, the explosive device resulted in the clean removal of a tank end, and this resulted in near-ideal launches of tub rockets. In one case, the rocket was launched vertically, and in another, the rocket was launched near 45 deg elevation angle giving a tub range of 370 m. In other cases, the explosive devices resulted in punctures, and in some of these, the resulting two-phase jet propelled the tanks over considerable distance. These examples gave a good opportunity to re-examine tub rocket models for tanks containing liquefied gases. This paper describes a theoretical model involving two-phase critical flow propulsion of cylindrical tanks. Three different critical flow models are compared, including the homogeneous equilibrium model (HEM), the homogeneous frozen model (HFM), and the Henry-Fauske model (HFK). Range predictions are compared with existing data and a model previously developed. Model predictions are calibrated to the field trial results described in the foregoing and then used to predict realistic ranges for various sizes of storage and transport tanks. | |
publisher | The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) | |
title | A Re-Examination of Propane Tank Tub Rockets Including Field Trial Results | |
type | Journal Paper | |
journal volume | 119 | |
journal issue | 3 | |
journal title | Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology | |
identifier doi | 10.1115/1.2842316 | |
journal fristpage | 356 | |
journal lastpage | 364 | |
identifier eissn | 1528-8978 | |
keywords | Rockets | |
keywords | Explosives | |
keywords | Failure | |
keywords | Flow (Dynamics) | |
keywords | Gases | |
keywords | Propulsion | |
keywords | Equilibrium (Physics) | |
keywords | Pressure | |
keywords | Storage AND Transport Tank Code | |
tree | Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology:;1997:;volume( 119 ):;issue: 003 | |
contenttype | Fulltext |