Enumerating Possible Design Options for Integral Attachment Using a Hierarchical Classification SchemeSource: Journal of Mechanical Design:;1997:;volume( 119 ):;issue: 002::page 178DOI: 10.1115/1.2826233Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
Abstract: The proliferation of plastic in parts, and the ability to mold such parts of great complexity at little cost penalty, has resulted in the growing use of integral attachment in the form of snap-fit features in designs. Heretofore, the great diversity in geometry of mating parts and of available integral attachment snap-fit features (e.g., cantilever hooks, compression traps, bayonet-fingers, etc.) has made it appear that assembly design possibilities may be unbounded, and that attempts at optimization might be intractable. This paper enumerates all possible assembly design options using a hierarchical classification scheme. In so doing, it guides new designers and validates choices for experienced ones. The result is great order and simplicity that facilitates better understanding of this assembly joining method, better communication, development of design aids, and improved and extended attachment performance.
keyword(s): Design , Manufacturing , Snap fitting , Joining , Optimization , Cantilevers , Compression AND Geometry ,
|
Collections
Show full item record
contributor author | S. Genc | |
contributor author | R. W. Messler | |
contributor author | P. R. Bonenberger | |
contributor author | G. A. Gabriele | |
date accessioned | 2017-05-08T23:54:13Z | |
date available | 2017-05-08T23:54:13Z | |
date copyright | June, 1997 | |
date issued | 1997 | |
identifier issn | 1050-0472 | |
identifier other | JMDEDB-27645#178_1.pdf | |
identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/119119 | |
description abstract | The proliferation of plastic in parts, and the ability to mold such parts of great complexity at little cost penalty, has resulted in the growing use of integral attachment in the form of snap-fit features in designs. Heretofore, the great diversity in geometry of mating parts and of available integral attachment snap-fit features (e.g., cantilever hooks, compression traps, bayonet-fingers, etc.) has made it appear that assembly design possibilities may be unbounded, and that attempts at optimization might be intractable. This paper enumerates all possible assembly design options using a hierarchical classification scheme. In so doing, it guides new designers and validates choices for experienced ones. The result is great order and simplicity that facilitates better understanding of this assembly joining method, better communication, development of design aids, and improved and extended attachment performance. | |
publisher | The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) | |
title | Enumerating Possible Design Options for Integral Attachment Using a Hierarchical Classification Scheme | |
type | Journal Paper | |
journal volume | 119 | |
journal issue | 2 | |
journal title | Journal of Mechanical Design | |
identifier doi | 10.1115/1.2826233 | |
journal fristpage | 178 | |
journal lastpage | 184 | |
identifier eissn | 1528-9001 | |
keywords | Design | |
keywords | Manufacturing | |
keywords | Snap fitting | |
keywords | Joining | |
keywords | Optimization | |
keywords | Cantilevers | |
keywords | Compression AND Geometry | |
tree | Journal of Mechanical Design:;1997:;volume( 119 ):;issue: 002 | |
contenttype | Fulltext |