YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Fluids Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Fluids Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Uncertainties and CFD Code Validation

    Source: Journal of Fluids Engineering:;1997:;volume( 119 ):;issue: 004::page 795
    Author:
    H. W. Coleman
    ,
    F. Stern
    DOI: 10.1115/1.2819500
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: A new approach to computational fluid dynamics code validation is developed that gives proper consideration to experimental and simulation uncertainties. The comparison error is defined as the difference between the data and simulation values and represents the combination of all errors. The validation uncertainly is defined as the combination of the uncertainties in the experimental data and the portion of the uncertainties in the CFD prediction that can be estimated. This validation uncertainty sets the level at which validation can be achieved. The criterion for validation is that the magnitude of the comparison error must be less than the validation uncertainty. If validation is not accomplished, the magnitude and sign of the comparison error can be used to improve the mathematical modeling. Consideration is given to validation procedures for a single code, multiple codes and/or models, and predictions of trends. Example results of verification/validation are presented for a single computational fluid dynamics code and for a comparison of multiple turbulence models. The results demonstrate the usefulness of the proposed validation strategy. This new approach for validation should be useful in guiding future developments in computational fluid dynamics through validation studies and in the transition of computational fluid dynamics codes to design.
    keyword(s): Computational fluid dynamics , Errors , Uncertainty , Simulation , Turbulence , Design AND Modeling ,
    • Download: (1.096Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Uncertainties and CFD Code Validation

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/118838
    Collections
    • Journal of Fluids Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorH. W. Coleman
    contributor authorF. Stern
    date accessioned2017-05-08T23:53:44Z
    date available2017-05-08T23:53:44Z
    date copyrightDecember, 1997
    date issued1997
    identifier issn0098-2202
    identifier otherJFEGA4-27123#795_1.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/118838
    description abstractA new approach to computational fluid dynamics code validation is developed that gives proper consideration to experimental and simulation uncertainties. The comparison error is defined as the difference between the data and simulation values and represents the combination of all errors. The validation uncertainly is defined as the combination of the uncertainties in the experimental data and the portion of the uncertainties in the CFD prediction that can be estimated. This validation uncertainty sets the level at which validation can be achieved. The criterion for validation is that the magnitude of the comparison error must be less than the validation uncertainty. If validation is not accomplished, the magnitude and sign of the comparison error can be used to improve the mathematical modeling. Consideration is given to validation procedures for a single code, multiple codes and/or models, and predictions of trends. Example results of verification/validation are presented for a single computational fluid dynamics code and for a comparison of multiple turbulence models. The results demonstrate the usefulness of the proposed validation strategy. This new approach for validation should be useful in guiding future developments in computational fluid dynamics through validation studies and in the transition of computational fluid dynamics codes to design.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleUncertainties and CFD Code Validation
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume119
    journal issue4
    journal titleJournal of Fluids Engineering
    identifier doi10.1115/1.2819500
    journal fristpage795
    journal lastpage803
    identifier eissn1528-901X
    keywordsComputational fluid dynamics
    keywordsErrors
    keywordsUncertainty
    keywordsSimulation
    keywordsTurbulence
    keywordsDesign AND Modeling
    treeJournal of Fluids Engineering:;1997:;volume( 119 ):;issue: 004
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian