YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Energy Resources Technology
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Energy Resources Technology
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    A Review of Multiphase Flow Through Chokes

    Source: Journal of Energy Resources Technology:;1997:;volume( 119 ):;issue: 001::page 1
    Author:
    S. Rastoin
    ,
    Z. Schmidt
    ,
    D. R. Doty
    DOI: 10.1115/1.2794216
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: Three comprehensive mechanistic models (Ashford and Pierce, 1974; Sachdeva et al., 1986; Perkins, 1990) dealing with multiphase flow through chokes have been studied. Their common purpose is to determine the flow through a choke under both critical and subcritical flow. Except for their initial assumptions, these three models are basically the same and all are based on the energy equation. Performance of the model developed by Perkins (1990) was the best in a comparison test against a database of 1239 points. The other two models deviated up to 40 percent when compared to the Perkins model for large values of choke to pipe size ratios. A very important application of these models is in prediction of the pressure either upstream or downstream of the choke, given the flow rate through the choke and the known pressure. Pressure predictions against the flow direction (i.e., upstream of the choke) were foundto be in very good agreement with measurements. Not more than 13 percent average absolute error and 17 percent standard deviation were observed. Similar errors were reported for the downstream pressure predictions for data in the subcritical flow regime. However, downstream pressure predictions for data in the critical flow regime gave large errors, up to 40 percent, which were expected.
    keyword(s): Multiphase flow , Flow (Dynamics) , Pressure , Errors , Pipe sizes , Measurement , Databases AND Equations ,
    • Download: (897.3Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      A Review of Multiphase Flow Through Chokes

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/118590
    Collections
    • Journal of Energy Resources Technology

    Show full item record

    contributor authorS. Rastoin
    contributor authorZ. Schmidt
    contributor authorD. R. Doty
    date accessioned2017-05-08T23:53:17Z
    date available2017-05-08T23:53:17Z
    date copyrightMarch, 1997
    date issued1997
    identifier issn0195-0738
    identifier otherJERTD2-26469#1_1.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/118590
    description abstractThree comprehensive mechanistic models (Ashford and Pierce, 1974; Sachdeva et al., 1986; Perkins, 1990) dealing with multiphase flow through chokes have been studied. Their common purpose is to determine the flow through a choke under both critical and subcritical flow. Except for their initial assumptions, these three models are basically the same and all are based on the energy equation. Performance of the model developed by Perkins (1990) was the best in a comparison test against a database of 1239 points. The other two models deviated up to 40 percent when compared to the Perkins model for large values of choke to pipe size ratios. A very important application of these models is in prediction of the pressure either upstream or downstream of the choke, given the flow rate through the choke and the known pressure. Pressure predictions against the flow direction (i.e., upstream of the choke) were foundto be in very good agreement with measurements. Not more than 13 percent average absolute error and 17 percent standard deviation were observed. Similar errors were reported for the downstream pressure predictions for data in the subcritical flow regime. However, downstream pressure predictions for data in the critical flow regime gave large errors, up to 40 percent, which were expected.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleA Review of Multiphase Flow Through Chokes
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume119
    journal issue1
    journal titleJournal of Energy Resources Technology
    identifier doi10.1115/1.2794216
    journal fristpage1
    journal lastpage10
    identifier eissn1528-8994
    keywordsMultiphase flow
    keywordsFlow (Dynamics)
    keywordsPressure
    keywordsErrors
    keywordsPipe sizes
    keywordsMeasurement
    keywordsDatabases AND Equations
    treeJournal of Energy Resources Technology:;1997:;volume( 119 ):;issue: 001
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian