Multistage Turbine Simulations With Vortex–Blade InteractionSource: Journal of Turbomachinery:;1996:;volume( 118 ):;issue: 004::page 643Author:M. G. Turner
DOI: 10.1115/1.2840920Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
Abstract: The average passage approach of Adamczyk et al. (1990) has been used to simulate the multistage environment of the General Electric E3 low-pressure turbine. Four configurations have been analyzed and compared to test data. These include the nozzle only, the first stage, the first stage and a half, and the first two stages. A high casing slope on the first-stage nozzle causes the secondary flow vortex to separate off the casing and enter the downstream rotor. The detrimental effect on performance due to this vortex interaction has been predicted by the above approach, whereas isolated blade row calculations cannot simulate this interaction. The unsteady analysis developed by Chen et al. (1994) has also been run to understand the unsteady flow field in the first-stage rotor and compare with the average passage model and test data. Comparisons of both the steady and unsteady analyses with data are generally good, although in the region near the casing of the shrouded rotors, the predicted loss is lower than that shown by the data.
keyword(s): Engineering simulation , Turbines , Vortices , Blades , Rotors , Nozzles , Pressure , Flow (Dynamics) AND Unsteady flow ,
|
Collections
Show full item record
contributor author | M. G. Turner | |
date accessioned | 2017-05-08T23:51:49Z | |
date available | 2017-05-08T23:51:49Z | |
date copyright | October, 1996 | |
date issued | 1996 | |
identifier issn | 0889-504X | |
identifier other | JOTUEI-28655#643_1.pdf | |
identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/117793 | |
description abstract | The average passage approach of Adamczyk et al. (1990) has been used to simulate the multistage environment of the General Electric E3 low-pressure turbine. Four configurations have been analyzed and compared to test data. These include the nozzle only, the first stage, the first stage and a half, and the first two stages. A high casing slope on the first-stage nozzle causes the secondary flow vortex to separate off the casing and enter the downstream rotor. The detrimental effect on performance due to this vortex interaction has been predicted by the above approach, whereas isolated blade row calculations cannot simulate this interaction. The unsteady analysis developed by Chen et al. (1994) has also been run to understand the unsteady flow field in the first-stage rotor and compare with the average passage model and test data. Comparisons of both the steady and unsteady analyses with data are generally good, although in the region near the casing of the shrouded rotors, the predicted loss is lower than that shown by the data. | |
publisher | The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) | |
title | Multistage Turbine Simulations With Vortex–Blade Interaction | |
type | Journal Paper | |
journal volume | 118 | |
journal issue | 4 | |
journal title | Journal of Turbomachinery | |
identifier doi | 10.1115/1.2840920 | |
journal fristpage | 643 | |
journal lastpage | 653 | |
identifier eissn | 1528-8900 | |
keywords | Engineering simulation | |
keywords | Turbines | |
keywords | Vortices | |
keywords | Blades | |
keywords | Rotors | |
keywords | Nozzles | |
keywords | Pressure | |
keywords | Flow (Dynamics) AND Unsteady flow | |
tree | Journal of Turbomachinery:;1996:;volume( 118 ):;issue: 004 | |
contenttype | Fulltext |