YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Fluids Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Fluids Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Testing Three-Dimensional Bluff-Body Models in a Low-Speed Two-Dimensional Adaptive Wall Test Section

    Source: Journal of Fluids Engineering:;1995:;volume( 117 ):;issue: 004::page 546
    Author:
    D. Sumner
    ,
    E. Brundrett
    DOI: 10.1115/1.2817299
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: Thin, sharp-edged disk models were evaluated in a low-speed two-dimensional adaptive flexible wall test section to determine the optimum adaptive wall testing environment for three-dimensional bluff-body models, by providing model testing recommendations for nominal solid blockage ratio and model span ratio. Drag coefficient measurements obtained under straight wall and adapted wall conditions showed that for a two-dimensional adaptive wall test section, the model span ratio imposes a more severe restriction upon model size than does the nominal solid blockage ratio. Minimum wall interference conditions were achieved with adapted walls for nominal solid blockage ratios less than 3 percent and model span ratios less than 21 percent, independent of the nominal test section aspect ratio, based on favorable comparison with previously-published experimental data. Data obtained under straight wall conditions confirmed that wall interference effects can only be neglected in conventional, straight-walled test sections for solid blockage ratios less than 0.5 percent and model span ratios less than 10 percent. The post-test boundary correction method of Maskell was successfully used to adjust the straight wall test section drag coefficient measurements of the larger models for wall interference effects, but no direct measurements of wall interference are used with this method. The results support the careful use of a two-dimensional wall adjustment strategy for three-dimensional nonlifting flows.
    keyword(s): Testing , Measurement , Drag (Fluid dynamics) , Disks AND Flow (Dynamics) ,
    • Download: (896.8Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Testing Three-Dimensional Bluff-Body Models in a Low-Speed Two-Dimensional Adaptive Wall Test Section

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/115442
    Collections
    • Journal of Fluids Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorD. Sumner
    contributor authorE. Brundrett
    date accessioned2017-05-08T23:47:25Z
    date available2017-05-08T23:47:25Z
    date copyrightDecember, 1995
    date issued1995
    identifier issn0098-2202
    identifier otherJFEGA4-27099#546_1.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/115442
    description abstractThin, sharp-edged disk models were evaluated in a low-speed two-dimensional adaptive flexible wall test section to determine the optimum adaptive wall testing environment for three-dimensional bluff-body models, by providing model testing recommendations for nominal solid blockage ratio and model span ratio. Drag coefficient measurements obtained under straight wall and adapted wall conditions showed that for a two-dimensional adaptive wall test section, the model span ratio imposes a more severe restriction upon model size than does the nominal solid blockage ratio. Minimum wall interference conditions were achieved with adapted walls for nominal solid blockage ratios less than 3 percent and model span ratios less than 21 percent, independent of the nominal test section aspect ratio, based on favorable comparison with previously-published experimental data. Data obtained under straight wall conditions confirmed that wall interference effects can only be neglected in conventional, straight-walled test sections for solid blockage ratios less than 0.5 percent and model span ratios less than 10 percent. The post-test boundary correction method of Maskell was successfully used to adjust the straight wall test section drag coefficient measurements of the larger models for wall interference effects, but no direct measurements of wall interference are used with this method. The results support the careful use of a two-dimensional wall adjustment strategy for three-dimensional nonlifting flows.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleTesting Three-Dimensional Bluff-Body Models in a Low-Speed Two-Dimensional Adaptive Wall Test Section
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume117
    journal issue4
    journal titleJournal of Fluids Engineering
    identifier doi10.1115/1.2817299
    journal fristpage546
    journal lastpage551
    identifier eissn1528-901X
    keywordsTesting
    keywordsMeasurement
    keywordsDrag (Fluid dynamics)
    keywordsDisks AND Flow (Dynamics)
    treeJournal of Fluids Engineering:;1995:;volume( 117 ):;issue: 004
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian