YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    ASME 1993 Nadai Lecture—Elastoplastic Stress and Strain Concentrations

    Source: Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology:;1995:;volume( 117 ):;issue: 001::page 1
    Author:
    William N. Sharpe
    DOI: 10.1115/1.2804366
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: Elastic stress concentration factors are familiar and easily incorporated into the design of components or structures through charts or finite element analysis. However when the material at the most concentrated location no longer behaves elastically, computation of the local stresses and strains is not so easy. Local elastoplastic behavior is an especially important consideration when the loading is cyclic. This paper summarizes the predictive capability of the Neuber and the Glinka models that relate gross loading to the local stresses and strains. The author and his students have used a unique laser-based technique capable of measuring biaxial strains over very short gage lengths to evaluate the two models. Their results, as well as those from earlier studies by other researchers using foil gages, lead to the general conclusion that the Neuber model works best when the local region is in a state of plane stress and the Glinka model is best for plane strain. There are intermediate levels of constraint that are neither plane stress nor plane strain. This paper presents a recommended practice for predicting the local elastoplastic stresses and strains for any constraint. First, one computes or estimates the initial elastic strains. Then, based on the amount of elastic constraint, one selects the appropriate model to compute the local elastoplastic stresses and strains.
    keyword(s): Stress , Gages , Plane strain , Students , Lasers , Stress concentration , Design , Finite element analysis AND Computation ,
    • Download: (1.026Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      ASME 1993 Nadai Lecture—Elastoplastic Stress and Strain Concentrations

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/115419
    Collections
    • Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology

    Show full item record

    contributor authorWilliam N. Sharpe
    date accessioned2017-05-08T23:47:22Z
    date available2017-05-08T23:47:22Z
    date copyrightJanuary, 1995
    date issued1995
    identifier issn0094-4289
    identifier otherJEMTA8-26969#1_1.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/115419
    description abstractElastic stress concentration factors are familiar and easily incorporated into the design of components or structures through charts or finite element analysis. However when the material at the most concentrated location no longer behaves elastically, computation of the local stresses and strains is not so easy. Local elastoplastic behavior is an especially important consideration when the loading is cyclic. This paper summarizes the predictive capability of the Neuber and the Glinka models that relate gross loading to the local stresses and strains. The author and his students have used a unique laser-based technique capable of measuring biaxial strains over very short gage lengths to evaluate the two models. Their results, as well as those from earlier studies by other researchers using foil gages, lead to the general conclusion that the Neuber model works best when the local region is in a state of plane stress and the Glinka model is best for plane strain. There are intermediate levels of constraint that are neither plane stress nor plane strain. This paper presents a recommended practice for predicting the local elastoplastic stresses and strains for any constraint. First, one computes or estimates the initial elastic strains. Then, based on the amount of elastic constraint, one selects the appropriate model to compute the local elastoplastic stresses and strains.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleASME 1993 Nadai Lecture—Elastoplastic Stress and Strain Concentrations
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume117
    journal issue1
    journal titleJournal of Engineering Materials and Technology
    identifier doi10.1115/1.2804366
    journal fristpage1
    journal lastpage7
    identifier eissn1528-8889
    keywordsStress
    keywordsGages
    keywordsPlane strain
    keywordsStudents
    keywordsLasers
    keywordsStress concentration
    keywordsDesign
    keywordsFinite element analysis AND Computation
    treeJournal of Engineering Materials and Technology:;1995:;volume( 117 ):;issue: 001
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian