YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Analysis of Mass Transfer Process in the Pore Free Technique

    Source: Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology:;1995:;volume( 117 ):;issue: 002::page 215
    Author:
    Genick Bar-Meir
    DOI: 10.1115/1.2804532
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: Air entrainment is one of the most significant problems in pressure die casting. A possible solution is to use the Pore Free technique. In this technique an oxygen is introduced into the die to react with the liquid metal. The vacuum created by the reaction reduces the porosity. The life span of the mold is augmented by the reduction of the pressure during the process. In some cases the Pore Free technique yields acceptable results, i.e., low porosity, while in other cases the results are not satisfactory. These differing results can be explained by an analysis of the mechanisms involved. A simple model is proposed based on conservation laws that describes the relationship between mass transfer mechanisms and pressure deviation. The model indicates that there is a critical dimensionless parameter above which the pressure is decreased and below which the pressure is increased. In the first case, when the parameter exceeds the critical value, the technique is useful. In the second case, when the parameter is less than the critical value, introducing oxygen does not greatly reduce the porosity. The analysis demonstrates that the Pore Free and vacuum venting techniques account for two different extremes. The first case is when the flow is orderly throughout the chamber in which vacuum venting can produce acceptable results. The second case is when the flow is turbulent and the Pore Free technique is the better choice.
    keyword(s): Mass transfer , Pressure , Vacuum , Porosity , Mechanisms , Flow (Dynamics) , Oxygen , Turbulence , Liquid metals AND Die casting (Process) ,
    • Download: (572.2Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Analysis of Mass Transfer Process in the Pore Free Technique

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/115415
    Collections
    • Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology

    Show full item record

    contributor authorGenick Bar-Meir
    date accessioned2017-05-08T23:47:21Z
    date available2017-05-08T23:47:21Z
    date copyrightApril, 1995
    date issued1995
    identifier issn0094-4289
    identifier otherJEMTA8-26970#215_1.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/115415
    description abstractAir entrainment is one of the most significant problems in pressure die casting. A possible solution is to use the Pore Free technique. In this technique an oxygen is introduced into the die to react with the liquid metal. The vacuum created by the reaction reduces the porosity. The life span of the mold is augmented by the reduction of the pressure during the process. In some cases the Pore Free technique yields acceptable results, i.e., low porosity, while in other cases the results are not satisfactory. These differing results can be explained by an analysis of the mechanisms involved. A simple model is proposed based on conservation laws that describes the relationship between mass transfer mechanisms and pressure deviation. The model indicates that there is a critical dimensionless parameter above which the pressure is decreased and below which the pressure is increased. In the first case, when the parameter exceeds the critical value, the technique is useful. In the second case, when the parameter is less than the critical value, introducing oxygen does not greatly reduce the porosity. The analysis demonstrates that the Pore Free and vacuum venting techniques account for two different extremes. The first case is when the flow is orderly throughout the chamber in which vacuum venting can produce acceptable results. The second case is when the flow is turbulent and the Pore Free technique is the better choice.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleAnalysis of Mass Transfer Process in the Pore Free Technique
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume117
    journal issue2
    journal titleJournal of Engineering Materials and Technology
    identifier doi10.1115/1.2804532
    journal fristpage215
    journal lastpage219
    identifier eissn1528-8889
    keywordsMass transfer
    keywordsPressure
    keywordsVacuum
    keywordsPorosity
    keywordsMechanisms
    keywordsFlow (Dynamics)
    keywordsOxygen
    keywordsTurbulence
    keywordsLiquid metals AND Die casting (Process)
    treeJournal of Engineering Materials and Technology:;1995:;volume( 117 ):;issue: 002
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian