Show simple item record

contributor authorP. Chiesa
contributor authorG. Lozza
contributor authorE. Macchi
contributor authorS. Consonni
date accessioned2017-05-08T23:47:08Z
date available2017-05-08T23:47:08Z
date copyrightJuly, 1995
date issued1995
identifier issn1528-8919
identifier otherJETPEZ-26741#499_1.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/115284
description abstractPart B of this paper focuses on intercooled recuperated cycles where water is injected to improve both efficiency and power output. This concept is investigated for two basic cycle configurations: a Recuperated Water Injected (RWI) cycle, where water is simply injected downstream of the HP compressor, and a Humid Air Turbine (HAT) cycle, where air/water mixing is accomplished in a countercurrent heat/mass transfer column called “saturator,” For both configurations we discuss the selection and the optimization of the main cycle parameters, and track the variations of efficiency and specific work with overall gas turbine pressure ratio and turbine inlet temperature (TIT). TIT can vary to take advantage of lower gas turbine coolant temperatures, but only within the capabilities of current technology. For HAT cycles we also address the modelization of the saturator and the sensitivity to the most crucial characteristics of novel components (temperature differences and pressure drops in heat/mass transfer equipment). The efficiency penalties associated with each process are evaluated by a second-law analysis, which also includes the cycles considered in Part A. For any given TIT in the range considered (1250 to 1500°C), the more reversible air/water mixing mechanism realized in the saturator allows HAT cycles to achieve efficiencies about 2 percentage points higher than those of RWI cycles: At the TIT of 1500°C made possible by intercooling, state-of-the-art aero-engines embodying the above-mentioned cycle modifications can reach net electrical efficiencies of about 57 and 55 percent, respectively. This compares to efficiencies slightly below 56 percent achievable by combined cycles based upon large-scale heavy-duty machines with TIT = 1280°C.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleAn Assessment of the Thermodynamic Performance of Mixed Gas–Steam Cycles: Part B—Water-Injected and HAT Cycles
typeJournal Paper
journal volume117
journal issue3
journal titleJournal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power
identifier doi10.1115/1.2814123
journal fristpage499
journal lastpage508
identifier eissn0742-4795
keywordsSteam
keywordsWater
keywordsCycles
keywordsTemperature
keywordsMass transfer
keywordsHeat
keywordsGas turbines
keywordsTurbines
keywordsPressure drop
keywordsAircraft engines
keywordsMechanisms
keywordsOptimization
keywordsPressure
keywordsMachinery
keywordsCompressors AND Coolants
treeJournal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power:;1995:;volume( 117 ):;issue: 003
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record