YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Turbomachinery
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Turbomachinery
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Unsteady Aerodynamic Forcing Functions: A Comparison Between Linear Theory and Experiment

    Source: Journal of Turbomachinery:;1994:;volume( 116 ):;issue: 004::page 676
    Author:
    J. M. Feiereisen
    ,
    M. D. Montgomery
    ,
    S. Fleeter
    DOI: 10.1115/1.2929460
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: The unsteady flow field generated by rotating rows of perforated plates and airfoil cascades is mathematically split into vortical and potential components using two methods, one relying entirely on velocity data and the other utilizing both velocity and unsteady static pressure data. The propagation and decay of these split flow perturbations are then examined and compared to linear theory predictions. The perforated plate gusts closely resemble linear theory vortical gusts. Both splitting methods indicate that they are dominantly vortical gusts with insignificant unsteady static pressure perturbations. The airfoil gusts resemble linear theory combined vortical and potential gusts. The recombined airfoil gusts using the vortical and potential components calculated by the method using only unsteady velocity data do not necessarily resemble the measured gusts, nor do they behave axially as predicted by linear theory. The recombined airfoil gusts using the linear theory components calculated by the method using both unsteady velocity and unsteady static pressure data do resemble the measured gusts and behave axially as predicted by linear theory, with the vortical component propagating unattenuated and the potential component decaying at the rate predicted by linear theory.
    keyword(s): Pressure , Flow (Dynamics) , Plates (structures) , Functions , Unsteady flow AND Airfoils ,
    • Download: (1004.Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Unsteady Aerodynamic Forcing Functions: A Comparison Between Linear Theory and Experiment

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/114520
    Collections
    • Journal of Turbomachinery

    Show full item record

    contributor authorJ. M. Feiereisen
    contributor authorM. D. Montgomery
    contributor authorS. Fleeter
    date accessioned2017-05-08T23:45:47Z
    date available2017-05-08T23:45:47Z
    date copyrightOctober, 1994
    date issued1994
    identifier issn0889-504X
    identifier otherJOTUEI-28639#676_1.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/114520
    description abstractThe unsteady flow field generated by rotating rows of perforated plates and airfoil cascades is mathematically split into vortical and potential components using two methods, one relying entirely on velocity data and the other utilizing both velocity and unsteady static pressure data. The propagation and decay of these split flow perturbations are then examined and compared to linear theory predictions. The perforated plate gusts closely resemble linear theory vortical gusts. Both splitting methods indicate that they are dominantly vortical gusts with insignificant unsteady static pressure perturbations. The airfoil gusts resemble linear theory combined vortical and potential gusts. The recombined airfoil gusts using the vortical and potential components calculated by the method using only unsteady velocity data do not necessarily resemble the measured gusts, nor do they behave axially as predicted by linear theory. The recombined airfoil gusts using the linear theory components calculated by the method using both unsteady velocity and unsteady static pressure data do resemble the measured gusts and behave axially as predicted by linear theory, with the vortical component propagating unattenuated and the potential component decaying at the rate predicted by linear theory.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleUnsteady Aerodynamic Forcing Functions: A Comparison Between Linear Theory and Experiment
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume116
    journal issue4
    journal titleJournal of Turbomachinery
    identifier doi10.1115/1.2929460
    journal fristpage676
    journal lastpage685
    identifier eissn1528-8900
    keywordsPressure
    keywordsFlow (Dynamics)
    keywordsPlates (structures)
    keywordsFunctions
    keywordsUnsteady flow AND Airfoils
    treeJournal of Turbomachinery:;1994:;volume( 116 ):;issue: 004
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian