Chucking Performance of a Wedge-Type Power ChuckSource: Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering:;1994:;volume( 116 ):;issue: 001::page 70DOI: 10.1115/1.2901811Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
Abstract: In order to improve the chucking performance of a wedge-type power chuck with three top jaws, bending tests, chucking accuracy tests, and cutting tests in the chuck-work system were performed using top jaws with different inner diameters, gripping positions, and taper angles. Bending stiffness, eccentricity of a workpiece, and cutting stability of the chuck were assessed using variance analysis. The inner diameter and the taper angle are effective to increase the bending stiffness; however, the gripping position is generally ineffective. With respect to the chucking accuracy, the effects of the inner diameter and the taper angle are significant; however, the effect of the gripping position is insignificant. Top jaws with tapered gripping parts are effective for limiting chatter vibration in actual use. Therefore, for the wedge-type power chuck used in the experiment, the use of the top jaws with tapered gripping parts is the most effective.
keyword(s): Wedges , Cutting , Stiffness , Stability , Vibration AND Chatter ,
|
Collections
Show full item record
| contributor author | S. Ema | |
| contributor author | E. Marui | |
| date accessioned | 2017-05-08T23:44:52Z | |
| date available | 2017-05-08T23:44:52Z | |
| date copyright | February, 1994 | |
| date issued | 1994 | |
| identifier issn | 1087-1357 | |
| identifier other | JMSEFK-27769#70_1.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/113963 | |
| description abstract | In order to improve the chucking performance of a wedge-type power chuck with three top jaws, bending tests, chucking accuracy tests, and cutting tests in the chuck-work system were performed using top jaws with different inner diameters, gripping positions, and taper angles. Bending stiffness, eccentricity of a workpiece, and cutting stability of the chuck were assessed using variance analysis. The inner diameter and the taper angle are effective to increase the bending stiffness; however, the gripping position is generally ineffective. With respect to the chucking accuracy, the effects of the inner diameter and the taper angle are significant; however, the effect of the gripping position is insignificant. Top jaws with tapered gripping parts are effective for limiting chatter vibration in actual use. Therefore, for the wedge-type power chuck used in the experiment, the use of the top jaws with tapered gripping parts is the most effective. | |
| publisher | The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) | |
| title | Chucking Performance of a Wedge-Type Power Chuck | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 116 | |
| journal issue | 1 | |
| journal title | Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering | |
| identifier doi | 10.1115/1.2901811 | |
| journal fristpage | 70 | |
| journal lastpage | 77 | |
| identifier eissn | 1528-8935 | |
| keywords | Wedges | |
| keywords | Cutting | |
| keywords | Stiffness | |
| keywords | Stability | |
| keywords | Vibration AND Chatter | |
| tree | Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering:;1994:;volume( 116 ):;issue: 001 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext |