YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Turbomachinery
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Turbomachinery
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Forcing Function Effects on Unsteady Aerodynamic Gust Response: Part 1—Forcing Functions

    Source: Journal of Turbomachinery:;1993:;volume( 115 ):;issue: 004::page 741
    Author:
    G. H. Henderson
    ,
    S. Fleeter
    DOI: 10.1115/1.2929309
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: The fundamental gust modeling assumption is investigated by means of a series of experiments performed in the Purdue Annular Cascade Research Facility. The unsteady periodic flow field is generated by rotating rows of perforated plates and airfoil cascades. In this paper, the measured unsteady flow fields are compared to linear-theory vortical gust requirements, with the resulting unsteady gust response of a downstream stator cascade correlated with linear theory predictions in an accompanying paper. The perforated-plate forcing functions closely resemble linear-theory forcing functions, with the static pressure fluctuations small and the periodic velocity vectors parallel to the downstream mean-relative flow angle over the entire periodic cycle. In contrast, the airfoil forcing functions exhibit characteristics far from linear-theory vortical gusts, with the alignment of the velocity vectors and the static pressure fluctuation amplitudes dependent on the rotor-loading condition, rotor solidity, and the inlet mean-relative flow angle. Thus, these unique data clearly show that airfoil wakes, both compressor and turbine, are not able to be modeled with the boundary conditions of current state-of-the-art linear unsteady aerodynamic theory.
    keyword(s): Functions , Flow (Dynamics) , Airfoils , Pressure , Cascades (Fluid dynamics) , Rotors , Turbines , Boundary-value problems , Cycles , Fluctuations (Physics) , Wakes , Modeling , Plates (structures) , Compressors , Stators AND Unsteady flow ,
    • Download: (1.025Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Forcing Function Effects on Unsteady Aerodynamic Gust Response: Part 1—Forcing Functions

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/112761
    Collections
    • Journal of Turbomachinery

    Show full item record

    contributor authorG. H. Henderson
    contributor authorS. Fleeter
    date accessioned2017-05-08T23:42:47Z
    date available2017-05-08T23:42:47Z
    date copyrightOctober, 1993
    date issued1993
    identifier issn0889-504X
    identifier otherJOTUEI-28633#741_1.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/112761
    description abstractThe fundamental gust modeling assumption is investigated by means of a series of experiments performed in the Purdue Annular Cascade Research Facility. The unsteady periodic flow field is generated by rotating rows of perforated plates and airfoil cascades. In this paper, the measured unsteady flow fields are compared to linear-theory vortical gust requirements, with the resulting unsteady gust response of a downstream stator cascade correlated with linear theory predictions in an accompanying paper. The perforated-plate forcing functions closely resemble linear-theory forcing functions, with the static pressure fluctuations small and the periodic velocity vectors parallel to the downstream mean-relative flow angle over the entire periodic cycle. In contrast, the airfoil forcing functions exhibit characteristics far from linear-theory vortical gusts, with the alignment of the velocity vectors and the static pressure fluctuation amplitudes dependent on the rotor-loading condition, rotor solidity, and the inlet mean-relative flow angle. Thus, these unique data clearly show that airfoil wakes, both compressor and turbine, are not able to be modeled with the boundary conditions of current state-of-the-art linear unsteady aerodynamic theory.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleForcing Function Effects on Unsteady Aerodynamic Gust Response: Part 1—Forcing Functions
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume115
    journal issue4
    journal titleJournal of Turbomachinery
    identifier doi10.1115/1.2929309
    journal fristpage741
    journal lastpage750
    identifier eissn1528-8900
    keywordsFunctions
    keywordsFlow (Dynamics)
    keywordsAirfoils
    keywordsPressure
    keywordsCascades (Fluid dynamics)
    keywordsRotors
    keywordsTurbines
    keywordsBoundary-value problems
    keywordsCycles
    keywordsFluctuations (Physics)
    keywordsWakes
    keywordsModeling
    keywordsPlates (structures)
    keywordsCompressors
    keywordsStators AND Unsteady flow
    treeJournal of Turbomachinery:;1993:;volume( 115 ):;issue: 004
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian