Tool-Work Thermocouple Temperature Measurements—Theory and Implementation IssuesSource: Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering:;1993:;volume( 115 ):;issue: 004::page 432Author:D. A. Stephenson
DOI: 10.1115/1.2901786Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
Abstract: Since cutting tools wear by temperature-activated mechanisms, it would be desirable to make tool temperature measurements during machinability tests. However, none of the laboratory methods for measuring temperatures reported in the literature is simple and reliable enough for routine testing. The method which is most promising is the tool-work thermocouple method, which yields a repeatable result which correlates well with tool wear for many materials. This method is not normally used in machinability testing because it is not clear what temperature the method actually measures and because, as conventionally described, it cannot be used for roughing cuts at high cutting speeds. The purpose of this paper is to extend both the theoretical understanding and range of application of the tool-work thermocouple method. The question of what temperature is measured by the method is answered by analyzing the electrical potential distribution in a cutting tool due to a distributed interfacial emf. It is shown that in general the tool-work thermocouple temperature differs from the average interfacial temperature, but that for tungsten carbide tools the difference is usually small. The isolation of the tool-work thermocouple circuit is also considered. Methods of measuring signals without introducing insulation between the chuck and workpiece and reducing the machining system stiffness are described. Finally, methods of minimizing measurement errors due to secondary junctions are discussed. Sample signals from machinability tests on steels are used to illustrate significant points.
keyword(s): Temperature measurement , Thermocouples , Temperature , Machinability , Signals , Wear , Cutting tools , Testing , Circuits , Cutting , Errors , Insulation , Junctions , Electric potential , Machining , Steel , Mechanisms , Stiffness , Grinding AND Carbide cutting tools ,
|
Collections
Show full item record
| contributor author | D. A. Stephenson | |
| date accessioned | 2017-05-08T23:41:47Z | |
| date available | 2017-05-08T23:41:47Z | |
| date copyright | November, 1993 | |
| date issued | 1993 | |
| identifier issn | 1087-1357 | |
| identifier other | JMSEFK-27768#432_1.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/112210 | |
| description abstract | Since cutting tools wear by temperature-activated mechanisms, it would be desirable to make tool temperature measurements during machinability tests. However, none of the laboratory methods for measuring temperatures reported in the literature is simple and reliable enough for routine testing. The method which is most promising is the tool-work thermocouple method, which yields a repeatable result which correlates well with tool wear for many materials. This method is not normally used in machinability testing because it is not clear what temperature the method actually measures and because, as conventionally described, it cannot be used for roughing cuts at high cutting speeds. The purpose of this paper is to extend both the theoretical understanding and range of application of the tool-work thermocouple method. The question of what temperature is measured by the method is answered by analyzing the electrical potential distribution in a cutting tool due to a distributed interfacial emf. It is shown that in general the tool-work thermocouple temperature differs from the average interfacial temperature, but that for tungsten carbide tools the difference is usually small. The isolation of the tool-work thermocouple circuit is also considered. Methods of measuring signals without introducing insulation between the chuck and workpiece and reducing the machining system stiffness are described. Finally, methods of minimizing measurement errors due to secondary junctions are discussed. Sample signals from machinability tests on steels are used to illustrate significant points. | |
| publisher | The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) | |
| title | Tool-Work Thermocouple Temperature Measurements—Theory and Implementation Issues | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 115 | |
| journal issue | 4 | |
| journal title | Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering | |
| identifier doi | 10.1115/1.2901786 | |
| journal fristpage | 432 | |
| journal lastpage | 437 | |
| identifier eissn | 1528-8935 | |
| keywords | Temperature measurement | |
| keywords | Thermocouples | |
| keywords | Temperature | |
| keywords | Machinability | |
| keywords | Signals | |
| keywords | Wear | |
| keywords | Cutting tools | |
| keywords | Testing | |
| keywords | Circuits | |
| keywords | Cutting | |
| keywords | Errors | |
| keywords | Insulation | |
| keywords | Junctions | |
| keywords | Electric potential | |
| keywords | Machining | |
| keywords | Steel | |
| keywords | Mechanisms | |
| keywords | Stiffness | |
| keywords | Grinding AND Carbide cutting tools | |
| tree | Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering:;1993:;volume( 115 ):;issue: 004 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext |