YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Fluids Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Fluids Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    A Comparison of the Linear and Nonlinear k–ε Turbulence Models in Combustors

    Source: Journal of Fluids Engineering:;1993:;volume( 115 ):;issue: 001::page 93
    Author:
    C. C. Hwang
    ,
    M. Massoudi
    ,
    J. M. Ekmann
    ,
    Genxing Zhu
    DOI: 10.1115/1.2910119
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: In swirling turbulent flows, the structure of turbulence is nonhomogeneous and anisotropic and it has been observed that the assumptions leading to the formulation of the k-ε model, which is used very often in many engineering applications, are inadequate for highly swirling flows. Furthermore, even with the various modifications made to the k-ε model, it is still not capable of describing secondary flows in noncircular ducts and it cannot predict non-zero normal-Reynolds-stress differences. Recently Speziale (1987) has developed a nonlinar k-ε model, which extends the range of validity of the standard k-ε model while maintaining most of the interesting features of the k-ε model; for example, the ease of application in existing Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) codes. In this work, we will use the nonlinear k-ε closure to model the turbulence in combustors. The particular combustor geometries selected for this study are (i) the flow in a round pipe entering an expansion into another coaxial round pipe, and (ii) the flow in two confined co-axial swirling jets. The results show that there are no significant differences in the performance of the two models. It is speculated that the inlet conditions for k and ε may play as crucial a role in achieving predicted accuracy as turbulence modeling details. Also it is possible that weaknesses in the performance of the modeled equations for k and ε may have masked differences in the two models.
    keyword(s): Combustion chambers , Turbulence , Flow (Dynamics) , Swirling flow , Pipes , Computational fluid dynamics , Engineering systems and industry applications , Modeling , Ducts , Equations , Stress AND Jets ,
    • Download: (834.9Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      A Comparison of the Linear and Nonlinear k–ε Turbulence Models in Combustors

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/112180
    Collections
    • Journal of Fluids Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorC. C. Hwang
    contributor authorM. Massoudi
    contributor authorJ. M. Ekmann
    contributor authorGenxing Zhu
    date accessioned2017-05-08T23:41:44Z
    date available2017-05-08T23:41:44Z
    date copyrightMarch, 1993
    date issued1993
    identifier issn0098-2202
    identifier otherJFEGA4-27073#93_1.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/112180
    description abstractIn swirling turbulent flows, the structure of turbulence is nonhomogeneous and anisotropic and it has been observed that the assumptions leading to the formulation of the k-ε model, which is used very often in many engineering applications, are inadequate for highly swirling flows. Furthermore, even with the various modifications made to the k-ε model, it is still not capable of describing secondary flows in noncircular ducts and it cannot predict non-zero normal-Reynolds-stress differences. Recently Speziale (1987) has developed a nonlinar k-ε model, which extends the range of validity of the standard k-ε model while maintaining most of the interesting features of the k-ε model; for example, the ease of application in existing Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) codes. In this work, we will use the nonlinear k-ε closure to model the turbulence in combustors. The particular combustor geometries selected for this study are (i) the flow in a round pipe entering an expansion into another coaxial round pipe, and (ii) the flow in two confined co-axial swirling jets. The results show that there are no significant differences in the performance of the two models. It is speculated that the inlet conditions for k and ε may play as crucial a role in achieving predicted accuracy as turbulence modeling details. Also it is possible that weaknesses in the performance of the modeled equations for k and ε may have masked differences in the two models.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleA Comparison of the Linear and Nonlinear k–ε Turbulence Models in Combustors
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume115
    journal issue1
    journal titleJournal of Fluids Engineering
    identifier doi10.1115/1.2910119
    journal fristpage93
    journal lastpage102
    identifier eissn1528-901X
    keywordsCombustion chambers
    keywordsTurbulence
    keywordsFlow (Dynamics)
    keywordsSwirling flow
    keywordsPipes
    keywordsComputational fluid dynamics
    keywordsEngineering systems and industry applications
    keywordsModeling
    keywordsDucts
    keywordsEquations
    keywordsStress AND Jets
    treeJournal of Fluids Engineering:;1993:;volume( 115 ):;issue: 001
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian