Vortex Shedding From a Bluff Body Adjacent to a Plane Sliding WallSource: Journal of Fluids Engineering:;1991:;volume( 113 ):;issue: 003::page 384DOI: 10.1115/1.2909508Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
Abstract: The characteristics of the flow around a bluff body of square cross-section in contact with a solid-wall boundary are investigated numerically using a finite difference procedure. Previous studies (Taneda, 1965; Kamemoto et al., 1984) have shown qualitatively the strong influence of solid-wall boundaries on the vortex-shedding process and the formation of the vortex street downstream. In the present study three cases are investigated which correspond to flow past a square rib in a freestream, flow past a rib on a fixed wall and flow past a rib on a sliding wall. Values of the Reynolds number studied ranged from 100 to 2000, where the Reynolds number is based on the rib height, H, and bulk stream velocity, Ub . Comparisons between the sliding-wall and fixed-wall cases show that the sliding wall has a significant destabilizing effect on the recirculation region behind the rib. Results show the onset of unsteadiness at a lower Reynolds number for the sliding-wall case (50 ≤ Recrit ≤100) than for the fixed-wall case (Recrit ≥100). A careful examination of the vortex-shedding process reveals similarities between the sliding-wall case and both the freestream and fixed-wall cases. At moderate Reynolds numbers (Re≥250) the sliding-wall results show that the rib periodically sheds vortices of alternating circulation in much the same manner as the rib in a freestream; as in, for example, Davis and Moore [1982]. The vortices are distributed asymmetrically downstream of the rib and are not of equal strength as in the freestream case. However, the sliding-wall case shows no tendency to develop cycle-to-cycle variations at higher Reynolds numbers, as observed in the freestream and fixed-wall cases. Thus, while the moving wall causes the flow past the rib to become unsteady at a lower Reynolds number than in the fixed-wall case, it also acts to stabilize or “lock-in” the vortex-shedding frequency. This is attributed to the additional source of positive vorticity immediately downstream of the rib on the sliding wall.
keyword(s): Vortex shedding , Reynolds number , Flow (Dynamics) , Vortices , Cycles , Locks (Waterways) , Vortex street AND Vorticity ,
|
Collections
Show full item record
contributor author | M. P. Arnal | |
contributor author | D. J. Goering | |
contributor author | J. A. C. Humphrey | |
date accessioned | 2017-05-08T23:35:47Z | |
date available | 2017-05-08T23:35:47Z | |
date copyright | September, 1991 | |
date issued | 1991 | |
identifier issn | 0098-2202 | |
identifier other | JFEGA4-27061#384_1.pdf | |
identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/108704 | |
description abstract | The characteristics of the flow around a bluff body of square cross-section in contact with a solid-wall boundary are investigated numerically using a finite difference procedure. Previous studies (Taneda, 1965; Kamemoto et al., 1984) have shown qualitatively the strong influence of solid-wall boundaries on the vortex-shedding process and the formation of the vortex street downstream. In the present study three cases are investigated which correspond to flow past a square rib in a freestream, flow past a rib on a fixed wall and flow past a rib on a sliding wall. Values of the Reynolds number studied ranged from 100 to 2000, where the Reynolds number is based on the rib height, H, and bulk stream velocity, Ub . Comparisons between the sliding-wall and fixed-wall cases show that the sliding wall has a significant destabilizing effect on the recirculation region behind the rib. Results show the onset of unsteadiness at a lower Reynolds number for the sliding-wall case (50 ≤ Recrit ≤100) than for the fixed-wall case (Recrit ≥100). A careful examination of the vortex-shedding process reveals similarities between the sliding-wall case and both the freestream and fixed-wall cases. At moderate Reynolds numbers (Re≥250) the sliding-wall results show that the rib periodically sheds vortices of alternating circulation in much the same manner as the rib in a freestream; as in, for example, Davis and Moore [1982]. The vortices are distributed asymmetrically downstream of the rib and are not of equal strength as in the freestream case. However, the sliding-wall case shows no tendency to develop cycle-to-cycle variations at higher Reynolds numbers, as observed in the freestream and fixed-wall cases. Thus, while the moving wall causes the flow past the rib to become unsteady at a lower Reynolds number than in the fixed-wall case, it also acts to stabilize or “lock-in” the vortex-shedding frequency. This is attributed to the additional source of positive vorticity immediately downstream of the rib on the sliding wall. | |
publisher | The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) | |
title | Vortex Shedding From a Bluff Body Adjacent to a Plane Sliding Wall | |
type | Journal Paper | |
journal volume | 113 | |
journal issue | 3 | |
journal title | Journal of Fluids Engineering | |
identifier doi | 10.1115/1.2909508 | |
journal fristpage | 384 | |
journal lastpage | 398 | |
identifier eissn | 1528-901X | |
keywords | Vortex shedding | |
keywords | Reynolds number | |
keywords | Flow (Dynamics) | |
keywords | Vortices | |
keywords | Cycles | |
keywords | Locks (Waterways) | |
keywords | Vortex street AND Vorticity | |
tree | Journal of Fluids Engineering:;1991:;volume( 113 ):;issue: 003 | |
contenttype | Fulltext |