Show simple item record

contributor authorC. F. Shih
contributor authorR. J. Asaro
contributor authorN. P. O’Dowd
date accessioned2017-05-08T23:34:36Z
date available2017-05-08T23:34:36Z
date copyrightJune, 1991
date issued1991
identifier issn0021-8936
identifier otherJAMCAV-26332#450_1.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/108041
description abstractIn Parts I and II, the structure of small-scale yielding fields of interface cracks were described in the context of small strain plasticity and J 2 deformation theory. These fields are members of a family parameterized by the plastic phase angle ξ which also determines the shape or phase of the plastic zone. Through full-field analysis, we showed the resemblance between the plane-strain interface crack-tip fields and mixed-mode HRR fields in homogeneous material. This connection was exploited, to the extent possible, inasmuch as the interface fields do not appear to have a separable form. The present investigation is focused on “opening” dominated load states (| ξ | ≤ π/6) and the scope is broadened to include finite ligament plasticity and finite deformation effects on near-tip fields. We adopt a geometrically rigorous formulation of J 2 flow theory taking full account of crack-tip blunting. Our results reveal several surprising effects, that have important implications for fracture, associated with finite ligament plasticity and finite strains. For one thing the fields that develop near bimaterial interfaces are more intense than those in homogeneous material when compared at the same value of J or remote load. For example, the plastic zones, plastic strains, and the crack-tip openings, δt , that evolve near bimaterial interfaces are considerably larger than those that develop in homogeneous materials. The stresses within the finite strain zone are also higher. In addition, a localized zone of high hydrostatic stresses develops near the crack tip but then expands rapidly within the weaker material as the plasticity spreads across the ligament. These stresses can be as much as 30 percent higher than those in homogeneous materials. Thus, the weaker material is subjected to large stresses as well as strains—states which promote ductile fracture processes. At the same time, the accompanying high interfacial stresses can promote interfacial fracture.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleElastic-Plastic Analysis of Cracks on Bimaterial Interfaces: Part III—Large-Scale Yielding
typeJournal Paper
journal volume58
journal issue2
journal titleJournal of Applied Mechanics
identifier doi10.1115/1.2897206
journal fristpage450
journal lastpage463
identifier eissn1528-9036
keywordsFlow (Dynamics)
keywordsHydrostatics
keywordsPlasticity
keywordsDeformation
keywordsStress
keywordsFracture (Materials)
keywordsFracture (Process)
keywordsPlane strain
keywordsShapes AND Ductile fracture
treeJournal of Applied Mechanics:;1991:;volume( 058 ):;issue: 002
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record