Rupture Hardware Minimization in Pressurized Water Reactor PipingSource: Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology:;1989:;volume( 111 ):;issue: 001::page 64Author:S. K. Mukherjee
,
V. Chexal
,
N. A. Goldstein
,
B. F. Beaudoin
,
D. F. Quiñones
,
D. M. Norris
,
J. J. Szy Slow Ski
,
W. L. Server
DOI: 10.1115/1.3265641Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
Abstract: For much of the high-energy piping in light water reactor systems, fracture mechanics calculations can be used to assure pipe failure resistance, thus allowing the elimination of excessive rupture restraint hardware both inside and outside containment. These calculations use the concept of leak-before-break (LBB) and include part-through-wall flaw fatigue crack propagation, through-wall flaw detectable leakage, and through-wall flaw stability analyses. Performing these analyses not only reduces initial construction, future maintenance, and radiation exposure costs, but also improves the overall safety and integrity of the plant since much more is known about the piping and its capabilities than would be the case had the analyses not been performed. This paper presents the LBB methodology applied at Beaver Valley Power Station—Unit 2 (BVPS-2); the application for two specific lines, one inside containment (stainless steel) and the other outside containment (ferritic steel), is shown in a generic sense using a simple parametric matrix. The overall results for BVPS-2 indicate that pipe rupture hardware is not necessary for stainless steel lines inside containment greater than or equal to 6-in. (152-mm) nominal pipe size that have passed a screening criteria designed to eliminate potential problem systems (such as the feedwater system). Similarly, some ferritic steel line as small as 3-in. (76-mm) diameter (outside containment) can qualify for pipe rupture hardware elimination.
keyword(s): Hardware , Pipes , Rupture , Pressurized water reactors , Containment , Stainless steel , Steel , Maintenance , Radiation (Physics) , Safety , Electrical resistance , Construction , Feedwater , Stability , Fracture mechanics , Leakage , Light water reactors , Power stations , Failure , Fatigue cracks , Industrial plants , Pipe sizes AND Leak-before-break ,
|
Collections
Show full item record
contributor author | S. K. Mukherjee | |
contributor author | V. Chexal | |
contributor author | N. A. Goldstein | |
contributor author | B. F. Beaudoin | |
contributor author | D. F. Quiñones | |
contributor author | D. M. Norris | |
contributor author | J. J. Szy Slow Ski | |
contributor author | W. L. Server | |
date accessioned | 2017-05-08T23:30:55Z | |
date available | 2017-05-08T23:30:55Z | |
date copyright | February, 1989 | |
date issued | 1989 | |
identifier issn | 0094-9930 | |
identifier other | JPVTAS-28307#64_1.pdf | |
identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/105916 | |
description abstract | For much of the high-energy piping in light water reactor systems, fracture mechanics calculations can be used to assure pipe failure resistance, thus allowing the elimination of excessive rupture restraint hardware both inside and outside containment. These calculations use the concept of leak-before-break (LBB) and include part-through-wall flaw fatigue crack propagation, through-wall flaw detectable leakage, and through-wall flaw stability analyses. Performing these analyses not only reduces initial construction, future maintenance, and radiation exposure costs, but also improves the overall safety and integrity of the plant since much more is known about the piping and its capabilities than would be the case had the analyses not been performed. This paper presents the LBB methodology applied at Beaver Valley Power Station—Unit 2 (BVPS-2); the application for two specific lines, one inside containment (stainless steel) and the other outside containment (ferritic steel), is shown in a generic sense using a simple parametric matrix. The overall results for BVPS-2 indicate that pipe rupture hardware is not necessary for stainless steel lines inside containment greater than or equal to 6-in. (152-mm) nominal pipe size that have passed a screening criteria designed to eliminate potential problem systems (such as the feedwater system). Similarly, some ferritic steel line as small as 3-in. (76-mm) diameter (outside containment) can qualify for pipe rupture hardware elimination. | |
publisher | The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) | |
title | Rupture Hardware Minimization in Pressurized Water Reactor Piping | |
type | Journal Paper | |
journal volume | 111 | |
journal issue | 1 | |
journal title | Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology | |
identifier doi | 10.1115/1.3265641 | |
journal fristpage | 64 | |
journal lastpage | 71 | |
identifier eissn | 1528-8978 | |
keywords | Hardware | |
keywords | Pipes | |
keywords | Rupture | |
keywords | Pressurized water reactors | |
keywords | Containment | |
keywords | Stainless steel | |
keywords | Steel | |
keywords | Maintenance | |
keywords | Radiation (Physics) | |
keywords | Safety | |
keywords | Electrical resistance | |
keywords | Construction | |
keywords | Feedwater | |
keywords | Stability | |
keywords | Fracture mechanics | |
keywords | Leakage | |
keywords | Light water reactors | |
keywords | Power stations | |
keywords | Failure | |
keywords | Fatigue cracks | |
keywords | Industrial plants | |
keywords | Pipe sizes AND Leak-before-break | |
tree | Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology:;1989:;volume( 111 ):;issue: 001 | |
contenttype | Fulltext |