Show simple item record

contributor authorA. Bejan
date accessioned2017-05-08T23:25:42Z
date available2017-05-08T23:25:42Z
date copyrightFebruary, 1987
date issued1987
identifier issn0199-6231
identifier otherJSEEDO-28196#46_1.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/103025
description abstractThe discussion of the ideal conversion of enclosed thermal radiation revolves around three different theories, whose earliest proponents were Petela, Spanner, and Jeter, respectively. Each of these theories has been accused to be incorrect. The objective of this paper is to provide a bird’s-eye-view of the relationship between these three theories. It is shown that the theories are individually correct, and that they complement (rather than contradict) one another. The present “unification” consists of answering two important questions: i ) What is the origin of the assumed blackbody radiation system? ii ) What is the ultimate fate of the blackbody radiation system? It is shown that the supply of high-temperature isotropic radiation postulated by all three theories is the result of a heat input from a high-temperature heat reservoir. When referenced to the same high-temperature heat input, Spanner’s ideal work output must always be smaller than Petela’s, and, in turn, Petela’s work output must be smaller than Jeter’s.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleUnification of Three Different Theories Concerning the Ideal Conversion of Enclosed Radiation
typeJournal Paper
journal volume109
journal issue1
journal titleJournal of Solar Energy Engineering
identifier doi10.1115/1.3268177
journal fristpage46
journal lastpage51
identifier eissn1528-8986
keywordsRadiation (Physics)
keywordsHeat
keywordsHigh temperature
keywordsBlackbody radiation
keywordsReservoirs AND Thermal radiation
treeJournal of Solar Energy Engineering:;1987:;volume( 109 ):;issue: 001
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record