YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    An Analysis of Drawbeads in Sheet Metal Forming: Part II—Experimental Verification

    Source: Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology:;1987:;volume( 109 ):;issue: 002::page 164
    Author:
    B. Maker
    ,
    S. K. Samanta
    ,
    G. Grab
    ,
    N. Triantafyllidis
    DOI: 10.1115/1.3225957
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: This paper presents experimental results obtained for a variety of drawbeads typical of automotive applications, and compares the results with those obtained from the numerical model presented in the first part of this work (Triantafyllidis et al., 1986). The deformation process is divided into two phases: the “locking/clamping” phase as the binder closes to form the sheet around the drawbead, and the “pulling” phase as the panel is formed, causing the material to be drawn through the bead. Metals considered are SKDQ steel, aluminum, and brass. Dry and lubricated conditions are investigated. Good correlations between model and experiment are obtained for strain distributions over the sheet and excellent agreement is observed in the binder clamping forces. Using a Coulomb friction law in the model, horizontal restraining forces are compared to experimental results. The model is shown to accurately predict the influence of variations in material, geometry, and friction conditions. However, the correlation between the model and experiment is not as good in two cases: as the punch (male bead) reaches the “locked” condition, and in the initial stages of “pulling” deformation. Reasons for the discrepancies are discussed.
    keyword(s): Force , Deformation , Friction , Metals , Aluminum , Brass (Metal) , Steel , Binders (Materials) , Computer simulation , Coulombs , Sheet metal work , Automotive industry AND Geometry ,
    • Download: (1.618Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      An Analysis of Drawbeads in Sheet Metal Forming: Part II—Experimental Verification

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/102530
    Collections
    • Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology

    Show full item record

    contributor authorB. Maker
    contributor authorS. K. Samanta
    contributor authorG. Grab
    contributor authorN. Triantafyllidis
    date accessioned2017-05-08T23:24:53Z
    date available2017-05-08T23:24:53Z
    date copyrightApril, 1987
    date issued1987
    identifier issn0094-4289
    identifier otherJEMTA8-26916#164_1.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/102530
    description abstractThis paper presents experimental results obtained for a variety of drawbeads typical of automotive applications, and compares the results with those obtained from the numerical model presented in the first part of this work (Triantafyllidis et al., 1986). The deformation process is divided into two phases: the “locking/clamping” phase as the binder closes to form the sheet around the drawbead, and the “pulling” phase as the panel is formed, causing the material to be drawn through the bead. Metals considered are SKDQ steel, aluminum, and brass. Dry and lubricated conditions are investigated. Good correlations between model and experiment are obtained for strain distributions over the sheet and excellent agreement is observed in the binder clamping forces. Using a Coulomb friction law in the model, horizontal restraining forces are compared to experimental results. The model is shown to accurately predict the influence of variations in material, geometry, and friction conditions. However, the correlation between the model and experiment is not as good in two cases: as the punch (male bead) reaches the “locked” condition, and in the initial stages of “pulling” deformation. Reasons for the discrepancies are discussed.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleAn Analysis of Drawbeads in Sheet Metal Forming: Part II—Experimental Verification
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume109
    journal issue2
    journal titleJournal of Engineering Materials and Technology
    identifier doi10.1115/1.3225957
    journal fristpage164
    journal lastpage170
    identifier eissn1528-8889
    keywordsForce
    keywordsDeformation
    keywordsFriction
    keywordsMetals
    keywordsAluminum
    keywordsBrass (Metal)
    keywordsSteel
    keywordsBinders (Materials)
    keywordsComputer simulation
    keywordsCoulombs
    keywordsSheet metal work
    keywordsAutomotive industry AND Geometry
    treeJournal of Engineering Materials and Technology:;1987:;volume( 109 ):;issue: 002
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian