Show simple item record

contributor authorJian-Qiao Sun
contributor authorC. S. Hsu
date accessioned2017-05-08T23:24:08Z
date available2017-05-08T23:24:08Z
date copyrightSeptember, 1987
date issued1987
identifier issn0021-8936
identifier otherJAMCAV-26284#649_1.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/102073
description abstractThe validity of the cumulant-neglect closure method is examined by applying it to a system for which an exact solution is available. A comparison of the results indicates that the Gaussian closure technique usually leads to a mean-square versus excitation strength curve which follows the same general shape as that of the exact solution but has substantial errors in some cases. The 4th order cumulant-neglect method is found to be inapplicable and to predict erroneous behavior for systems in certain parameter ranges, including a faulty prediction of a jump in response as the excitation varies through a certain critical value. On the other hand, for systems in other ranges the 4th order cumulant-neglect closure method predicts the mean square response quite well. These two parameter ranges are delineated in the paper. The 6th order cumulant-neglect closure method is also examined, leading to similar conclusions.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleCumulant-Neglect Closure Method for Nonlinear Systems Under Random Excitations
typeJournal Paper
journal volume54
journal issue3
journal titleJournal of Applied Mechanics
identifier doi10.1115/1.3173083
journal fristpage649
journal lastpage655
identifier eissn1528-9036
keywordsNonlinear systems
keywordsRandom excitation
keywordsShapes AND Errors
treeJournal of Applied Mechanics:;1987:;volume( 054 ):;issue: 003
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record