contributor author | R. P. Dring | |
contributor author | H. D. Joslyn | |
date accessioned | 2017-05-08T23:23:42Z | |
date available | 2017-05-08T23:23:42Z | |
date copyright | July, 1986 | |
date issued | 1986 | |
identifier issn | 0889-504X | |
identifier other | JOTUEI-28577#17_1.pdf | |
identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/101849 | |
description abstract | Through-flow theory is at the heart of turbomachinery aerodynamic design in that it provides the incidence and Mach number distributions that are ultimately used to define the rotor and stator airfoil contours. The assumption of axisymmetry plays a major role in the formulation of the theory and the consequences of this assumption have historically necessitated the introduction of “blockage” to account for the nonaxisymmetries in the flow. The present paper provides an assessment of these assumptions and of through-flow theory in general by making detailed comparisons between computed and measured results for a two-stage axial compressor. Part I focuses on the experimental benchmark data base and on how these data were used to fully define all of the aerodynamic input required by a through-flow analysis. | |
publisher | The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) | |
title | Through-Flow Analysis of a Multistage Compressor: Part I—Aerodynamic Input | |
type | Journal Paper | |
journal volume | 108 | |
journal issue | 1 | |
journal title | Journal of Turbomachinery | |
identifier doi | 10.1115/1.3262016 | |
journal fristpage | 17 | |
journal lastpage | 22 | |
identifier eissn | 1528-8900 | |
keywords | Compressors | |
keywords | Flow (Dynamics) | |
keywords | Mach number | |
keywords | Design | |
keywords | Rotors | |
keywords | Databases | |
keywords | Stators | |
keywords | Turbomachinery AND Airfoils | |
tree | Journal of Turbomachinery:;1986:;volume( 108 ):;issue: 001 | |
contenttype | Fulltext | |