YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Vibration and Acoustics
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Vibration and Acoustics
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Automated Analysis of Constrained Systems of Rigid and Flexible Bodies

    Source: Journal of Vibration and Acoustics:;1985:;volume( 107 ):;issue: 004::page 431
    Author:
    A. A. Shabana
    DOI: 10.1115/1.3269284
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: This paper is concerned with modeling inertia properties of flexible components that undergo large angular rotations. Consistent, lumped and hybrid mass techniques are presented in detail and used to model the inertia properties of flexible bodies. The consistent formulation allows using the finite-element method as well as Rayleigh-Ritz method to describe the deformation of elastic components. Lumped mass techniques allow using shape vectors or experimentally identified data. In the hybrid mass formulation, the flexibility mass matrix is evaluated using a consistent mass formulation, while the inertia coupling between gross rigid body motion and elastic deformation is formulated using a lumped mass technique. Different mass formulations require the evaluation of similar sets of time-invariant matrices that represent the inertia coupling. Consequently, these matrices have to be evaluated only once in advance for the dynamic analysis. A unified mathematical model, and accordingly a unified computer program (DAMS: Dynamic Analysis of Multibody Systems), that deal with different formulations are developed. A comparative study is presented in order to study the effect of the mass formulation on the dynamic response of elastodynamic constrained systems. The validity of the linear theory that neglects the effect of small oscillations on large rigid body motion is also discussed.
    keyword(s): Inertia (Mechanics) , Oscillations , Plasticity , Deformation , Dams , Motion , Finite element methods , Dynamic analysis , Modeling , Computer software , Dynamic response , Rayleigh-Ritz methods , Shapes AND Multibody systems ,
    • Download: (817.6Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Automated Analysis of Constrained Systems of Rigid and Flexible Bodies

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/100548
    Collections
    • Journal of Vibration and Acoustics

    Show full item record

    contributor authorA. A. Shabana
    date accessioned2017-05-08T23:21:25Z
    date available2017-05-08T23:21:25Z
    date copyrightOctober, 1985
    date issued1985
    identifier issn1048-9002
    identifier otherJVACEK-28967#431_1.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/100548
    description abstractThis paper is concerned with modeling inertia properties of flexible components that undergo large angular rotations. Consistent, lumped and hybrid mass techniques are presented in detail and used to model the inertia properties of flexible bodies. The consistent formulation allows using the finite-element method as well as Rayleigh-Ritz method to describe the deformation of elastic components. Lumped mass techniques allow using shape vectors or experimentally identified data. In the hybrid mass formulation, the flexibility mass matrix is evaluated using a consistent mass formulation, while the inertia coupling between gross rigid body motion and elastic deformation is formulated using a lumped mass technique. Different mass formulations require the evaluation of similar sets of time-invariant matrices that represent the inertia coupling. Consequently, these matrices have to be evaluated only once in advance for the dynamic analysis. A unified mathematical model, and accordingly a unified computer program (DAMS: Dynamic Analysis of Multibody Systems), that deal with different formulations are developed. A comparative study is presented in order to study the effect of the mass formulation on the dynamic response of elastodynamic constrained systems. The validity of the linear theory that neglects the effect of small oscillations on large rigid body motion is also discussed.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleAutomated Analysis of Constrained Systems of Rigid and Flexible Bodies
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume107
    journal issue4
    journal titleJournal of Vibration and Acoustics
    identifier doi10.1115/1.3269284
    journal fristpage431
    journal lastpage439
    identifier eissn1528-8927
    keywordsInertia (Mechanics)
    keywordsOscillations
    keywordsPlasticity
    keywordsDeformation
    keywordsDams
    keywordsMotion
    keywordsFinite element methods
    keywordsDynamic analysis
    keywordsModeling
    keywordsComputer software
    keywordsDynamic response
    keywordsRayleigh-Ritz methods
    keywordsShapes AND Multibody systems
    treeJournal of Vibration and Acoustics:;1985:;volume( 107 ):;issue: 004
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian