YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Fluids Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Fluids Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Node Selection for Two-Point Boundary-Value Problems

    Source: Journal of Fluids Engineering:;1985:;volume( 107 ):;issue: 003::page 364
    Author:
    C. M. Ablow
    ,
    W. H. Zwisler
    ,
    S. Schechter
    DOI: 10.1115/1.3242494
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: The solutions of two-point boundary-value problems often have boundary layers, narrow regions of sharp variation, that can occur in any part of the interval between the points. A finite difference method of numerical solution will generally require more closely spaced nodes in the boundary layers than elsewhere. An automatic method is needed for achieving the irregular spacing when the location of the boundary layer is not known in advance. Several automatic node-insertion or node-movement methods have been proposed. A new node-movement method is presented that is optimal under the criterion of producing the least sum of squares of the truncation errors at the nodes. For the Keller box scheme applied to a system of N coupled first-order differential equations this truncation-error minimizing (TEM) method increases the system size to N+6 equations. The campylotropic coordinate transformation method and other published methods based on heuristically derived monitor functions are node-movement methods that involve systems of only N+1 or N+2 first order equations. A comparison is made of the accuracies of several such methods and the TEM method in the solution of a standard problem.
    keyword(s): Boundary-value problems , Boundary layers , Equations , Errors , Finite difference methods , Functions AND Differential equations ,
    • Download: (586.2Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Node Selection for Two-Point Boundary-Value Problems

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/100006
    Collections
    • Journal of Fluids Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorC. M. Ablow
    contributor authorW. H. Zwisler
    contributor authorS. Schechter
    date accessioned2017-05-08T23:20:32Z
    date available2017-05-08T23:20:32Z
    date copyrightSeptember, 1985
    date issued1985
    identifier issn0098-2202
    identifier otherJFEGA4-27014#364_1.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/100006
    description abstractThe solutions of two-point boundary-value problems often have boundary layers, narrow regions of sharp variation, that can occur in any part of the interval between the points. A finite difference method of numerical solution will generally require more closely spaced nodes in the boundary layers than elsewhere. An automatic method is needed for achieving the irregular spacing when the location of the boundary layer is not known in advance. Several automatic node-insertion or node-movement methods have been proposed. A new node-movement method is presented that is optimal under the criterion of producing the least sum of squares of the truncation errors at the nodes. For the Keller box scheme applied to a system of N coupled first-order differential equations this truncation-error minimizing (TEM) method increases the system size to N+6 equations. The campylotropic coordinate transformation method and other published methods based on heuristically derived monitor functions are node-movement methods that involve systems of only N+1 or N+2 first order equations. A comparison is made of the accuracies of several such methods and the TEM method in the solution of a standard problem.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleNode Selection for Two-Point Boundary-Value Problems
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume107
    journal issue3
    journal titleJournal of Fluids Engineering
    identifier doi10.1115/1.3242494
    journal fristpage364
    journal lastpage369
    identifier eissn1528-901X
    keywordsBoundary-value problems
    keywordsBoundary layers
    keywordsEquations
    keywordsErrors
    keywordsFinite difference methods
    keywordsFunctions AND Differential equations
    treeJournal of Fluids Engineering:;1985:;volume( 107 ):;issue: 003
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian