Flow Split Relationships in Two-Phase Parallel Channel FlowsSource: Journal of Fluids Engineering:;1982:;volume( 104 ):;issue: 004::page 455DOI: 10.1115/1.3241881Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
Abstract: The observed flow combinations through the channels were: cocurrent upflow in both channels, cocurrent upflow in one and countercurrent flow in the other channel, and cocurrent upflow in one and single phase liquid downflow in the other channel. The flow regimes in each channel varied from churn-turbulent, through anular flow, to chugging counter-current flow, as the flow conditions were varied. It was observed that the flow combination obtained was history dependent. However, for given flow combinations, certain flow split relationships were established. With both channels in cocurrent upflow, the flow quality into each channel was approximately the same as the flow quality in the lower plenum at the flow split elevation. For the other flow combinations, a simple relationship between the void fractions at the bottom of the channels which had two phase fluid, and the average void fraction and vapour flux in the lower plenum at the flow split elevation, was established.
keyword(s): Flow (Dynamics) , Channel flow , Channels (Hydraulic engineering) , Turbulence , Fluids AND Porosity ,
|
Collections
Show full item record
| contributor author | O. C. Iloeje | |
| contributor author | J. A. Kervinen | |
| contributor author | J. Ireland | |
| contributor author | B. S. Shiralkar | |
| date accessioned | 2017-05-08T23:13:32Z | |
| date available | 2017-05-08T23:13:32Z | |
| date copyright | December, 1982 | |
| date issued | 1982 | |
| identifier issn | 0098-2202 | |
| identifier other | JFEGA4-26990#455_1.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/95932 | |
| description abstract | The observed flow combinations through the channels were: cocurrent upflow in both channels, cocurrent upflow in one and countercurrent flow in the other channel, and cocurrent upflow in one and single phase liquid downflow in the other channel. The flow regimes in each channel varied from churn-turbulent, through anular flow, to chugging counter-current flow, as the flow conditions were varied. It was observed that the flow combination obtained was history dependent. However, for given flow combinations, certain flow split relationships were established. With both channels in cocurrent upflow, the flow quality into each channel was approximately the same as the flow quality in the lower plenum at the flow split elevation. For the other flow combinations, a simple relationship between the void fractions at the bottom of the channels which had two phase fluid, and the average void fraction and vapour flux in the lower plenum at the flow split elevation, was established. | |
| publisher | The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) | |
| title | Flow Split Relationships in Two-Phase Parallel Channel Flows | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 104 | |
| journal issue | 4 | |
| journal title | Journal of Fluids Engineering | |
| identifier doi | 10.1115/1.3241881 | |
| journal fristpage | 455 | |
| journal lastpage | 462 | |
| identifier eissn | 1528-901X | |
| keywords | Flow (Dynamics) | |
| keywords | Channel flow | |
| keywords | Channels (Hydraulic engineering) | |
| keywords | Turbulence | |
| keywords | Fluids AND Porosity | |
| tree | Journal of Fluids Engineering:;1982:;volume( 104 ):;issue: 004 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext |