Show simple item record

contributor authorO. C. Iloeje
contributor authorJ. A. Kervinen
contributor authorJ. Ireland
contributor authorB. S. Shiralkar
date accessioned2017-05-08T23:13:32Z
date available2017-05-08T23:13:32Z
date copyrightDecember, 1982
date issued1982
identifier issn0098-2202
identifier otherJFEGA4-26990#455_1.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/95932
description abstractThe observed flow combinations through the channels were: cocurrent upflow in both channels, cocurrent upflow in one and countercurrent flow in the other channel, and cocurrent upflow in one and single phase liquid downflow in the other channel. The flow regimes in each channel varied from churn-turbulent, through anular flow, to chugging counter-current flow, as the flow conditions were varied. It was observed that the flow combination obtained was history dependent. However, for given flow combinations, certain flow split relationships were established. With both channels in cocurrent upflow, the flow quality into each channel was approximately the same as the flow quality in the lower plenum at the flow split elevation. For the other flow combinations, a simple relationship between the void fractions at the bottom of the channels which had two phase fluid, and the average void fraction and vapour flux in the lower plenum at the flow split elevation, was established.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleFlow Split Relationships in Two-Phase Parallel Channel Flows
typeJournal Paper
journal volume104
journal issue4
journal titleJournal of Fluids Engineering
identifier doi10.1115/1.3241881
journal fristpage455
journal lastpage462
identifier eissn1528-901X
keywordsFlow (Dynamics)
keywordsChannel flow
keywordsChannels (Hydraulic engineering)
keywordsTurbulence
keywordsFluids AND Porosity
treeJournal of Fluids Engineering:;1982:;volume( 104 ):;issue: 004
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record