YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Effects of Design‐Integrated Process Planning on Productivity in Rebar Placement

    Source: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management:;1994:;Volume ( 120 ):;issue: 004
    Author:
    Md. Salim
    ,
    Leonhard E. Bernold
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1994)120:4(720)
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: Reinforced‐concrete structures constitute a major portion of today's construction, and placement of reinforcing bars (rebar) is an integral phase of this type of construction. Placement of rebar is an assembly‐type operation with fabricated rebar being placed and tied one by one. Process‐oriented planning for the placement of rebar aims at the creation of a placement plan that can depict the assembly sequences of individual bars, or a set or sets of bars. While complex rebar configurations necessitate that the crew foreman creates in his or her mind or on paper such a detailed plan, this traditional planning effort does not impact the delivery and staging of rebar. This paper presents a concept of rebar delivery and staging based on a placement plan and discusses the implementation of the concept in a six‐story governmental office building project in Chapel Hill, N.C. Field data on crew performance for the placement of rebar was collected utilizing three different measurement techniques: (1) Productivity ratings; (2) five‐minute rating; and (3) continuous time study. The same crew was provided with the rebar delivered and staged two ways: (1) In a traditional manner; and (2) based on the placement sequences. Finally, a comparison of the productivity results was made. It will be demonstrated where process planning was able to significantly reduce nonproductive time.
    • Download: (1.390Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Effects of Design‐Integrated Process Planning on Productivity in Rebar Placement

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/75953
    Collections
    • Journal of Construction Engineering and Management

    Show full item record

    contributor authorMd. Salim
    contributor authorLeonhard E. Bernold
    date accessioned2017-05-08T22:16:39Z
    date available2017-05-08T22:16:39Z
    date copyrightDecember 1994
    date issued1994
    identifier other%28asce%290733-9364%281994%29120%3A4%28720%29.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/75953
    description abstractReinforced‐concrete structures constitute a major portion of today's construction, and placement of reinforcing bars (rebar) is an integral phase of this type of construction. Placement of rebar is an assembly‐type operation with fabricated rebar being placed and tied one by one. Process‐oriented planning for the placement of rebar aims at the creation of a placement plan that can depict the assembly sequences of individual bars, or a set or sets of bars. While complex rebar configurations necessitate that the crew foreman creates in his or her mind or on paper such a detailed plan, this traditional planning effort does not impact the delivery and staging of rebar. This paper presents a concept of rebar delivery and staging based on a placement plan and discusses the implementation of the concept in a six‐story governmental office building project in Chapel Hill, N.C. Field data on crew performance for the placement of rebar was collected utilizing three different measurement techniques: (1) Productivity ratings; (2) five‐minute rating; and (3) continuous time study. The same crew was provided with the rebar delivered and staged two ways: (1) In a traditional manner; and (2) based on the placement sequences. Finally, a comparison of the productivity results was made. It will be demonstrated where process planning was able to significantly reduce nonproductive time.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleEffects of Design‐Integrated Process Planning on Productivity in Rebar Placement
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume120
    journal issue4
    journal titleJournal of Construction Engineering and Management
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1994)120:4(720)
    treeJournal of Construction Engineering and Management:;1994:;Volume ( 120 ):;issue: 004
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian