| contributor author | William H. Hoofnagle III | |
| contributor author | Bryan W. Horn | |
| date accessioned | 2017-05-08T21:54:06Z | |
| date available | 2017-05-08T21:54:06Z | |
| date copyright | May 2013 | |
| date issued | 2013 | |
| identifier other | %28asce%29la%2E1943-4170%2E0000139.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/65868 | |
| description abstract | The Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) was enacted in 1925 by Congress to establish a national policy favoring arbitration and to end judicial indisposition to arbitration. Since then, courts have routinely enforced arbitration clauses in contracts. The FAA provides for expedited, but limited, judicial review of arbitration awards. The FAA sets forth specific grounds for vacating and modifying arbitration awards. Controversy arose, and remains, in the courts over whether there are other, nonstatutory grounds for judicial review of arbitration awards. This paper will examine the U.S. Supreme Court’s interpretation of the FAA in | |
| publisher | American Society of Civil Engineers | |
| title | Vacating Arbitration Awards for Manifest Disregard of the Law | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 5 | |
| journal issue | 2 | |
| journal title | Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction | |
| identifier doi | 10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000110 | |
| tree | Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction:;2013:;Volume ( 005 ):;issue: 002 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext | |