YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Vacating Arbitration Awards for Manifest Disregard of the Law

    Source: Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction:;2013:;Volume ( 005 ):;issue: 002
    Author:
    William H. Hoofnagle III
    ,
    Bryan W. Horn
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000110
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: The Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) was enacted in 1925 by Congress to establish a national policy favoring arbitration and to end judicial indisposition to arbitration. Since then, courts have routinely enforced arbitration clauses in contracts. The FAA provides for expedited, but limited, judicial review of arbitration awards. The FAA sets forth specific grounds for vacating and modifying arbitration awards. Controversy arose, and remains, in the courts over whether there are other, nonstatutory grounds for judicial review of arbitration awards. This paper will examine the U.S. Supreme Court’s interpretation of the FAA in
    • Download: (7.653Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Vacating Arbitration Awards for Manifest Disregard of the Law

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/65868
    Collections
    • Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction

    Show full item record

    contributor authorWilliam H. Hoofnagle III
    contributor authorBryan W. Horn
    date accessioned2017-05-08T21:54:06Z
    date available2017-05-08T21:54:06Z
    date copyrightMay 2013
    date issued2013
    identifier other%28asce%29la%2E1943-4170%2E0000139.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/65868
    description abstractThe Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) was enacted in 1925 by Congress to establish a national policy favoring arbitration and to end judicial indisposition to arbitration. Since then, courts have routinely enforced arbitration clauses in contracts. The FAA provides for expedited, but limited, judicial review of arbitration awards. The FAA sets forth specific grounds for vacating and modifying arbitration awards. Controversy arose, and remains, in the courts over whether there are other, nonstatutory grounds for judicial review of arbitration awards. This paper will examine the U.S. Supreme Court’s interpretation of the FAA in
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleVacating Arbitration Awards for Manifest Disregard of the Law
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume5
    journal issue2
    journal titleJournal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000110
    treeJournal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction:;2013:;Volume ( 005 ):;issue: 002
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian