Show simple item record

contributor authorWilliam H. Hoofnagle III
contributor authorBryan W. Horn
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:54:06Z
date available2017-05-08T21:54:06Z
date copyrightMay 2013
date issued2013
identifier other%28asce%29la%2E1943-4170%2E0000139.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/65868
description abstractThe Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) was enacted in 1925 by Congress to establish a national policy favoring arbitration and to end judicial indisposition to arbitration. Since then, courts have routinely enforced arbitration clauses in contracts. The FAA provides for expedited, but limited, judicial review of arbitration awards. The FAA sets forth specific grounds for vacating and modifying arbitration awards. Controversy arose, and remains, in the courts over whether there are other, nonstatutory grounds for judicial review of arbitration awards. This paper will examine the U.S. Supreme Court’s interpretation of the FAA in
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleVacating Arbitration Awards for Manifest Disregard of the Law
typeJournal Paper
journal volume5
journal issue2
journal titleJournal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000110
treeJournal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction:;2013:;Volume ( 005 ):;issue: 002
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record