Resolving Construction Disputes by Mediation: Hong Kong ExperienceSource: Journal of Management in Engineering:;1992:;Volume ( 008 ):;issue: 004Author:Kwok‐Wing Chau
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)9742-597X(1992)8:4(384)Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
Abstract: This paper reviews the state of the art of modern mediation processes and presents the experience of integrating mediation and arbitration to resolve disputes in Hong Kong's construction industry. Mediation, the principal mode of resolving disputes in ancient China, may have originated in Confucian philosophy, which stresses harmony and compromise. Resolving construction disputes using an adversarial approach such as arbitration is considered to be in opposition to the maintenance of a harmonious relationship between the two parties. The modern arbitration process may duplicate a litigation proceeding, leading to procrastination and cost escalation. The attention of the paper is focused on various dispute‐resolution alternatives such as mediation, which can provide for both time and cost savings. Besides, it is strongly favored by those in the industry that disputes be resolved within the construction industry itself. Hence, mediation is believed to have promising prospects in this field.
|
Collections
Show full item record
| contributor author | Kwok‐Wing Chau | |
| date accessioned | 2017-05-08T21:33:09Z | |
| date available | 2017-05-08T21:33:09Z | |
| date copyright | October 1992 | |
| date issued | 1992 | |
| identifier other | %28asce%299742-597x%281992%298%3A4%28384%29.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/55884 | |
| description abstract | This paper reviews the state of the art of modern mediation processes and presents the experience of integrating mediation and arbitration to resolve disputes in Hong Kong's construction industry. Mediation, the principal mode of resolving disputes in ancient China, may have originated in Confucian philosophy, which stresses harmony and compromise. Resolving construction disputes using an adversarial approach such as arbitration is considered to be in opposition to the maintenance of a harmonious relationship between the two parties. The modern arbitration process may duplicate a litigation proceeding, leading to procrastination and cost escalation. The attention of the paper is focused on various dispute‐resolution alternatives such as mediation, which can provide for both time and cost savings. Besides, it is strongly favored by those in the industry that disputes be resolved within the construction industry itself. Hence, mediation is believed to have promising prospects in this field. | |
| publisher | American Society of Civil Engineers | |
| title | Resolving Construction Disputes by Mediation: Hong Kong Experience | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 8 | |
| journal issue | 4 | |
| journal title | Journal of Management in Engineering | |
| identifier doi | 10.1061/(ASCE)9742-597X(1992)8:4(384) | |
| tree | Journal of Management in Engineering:;1992:;Volume ( 008 ):;issue: 004 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext |