Show simple item record

contributor authorKwok‐Wing Chau
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:33:09Z
date available2017-05-08T21:33:09Z
date copyrightOctober 1992
date issued1992
identifier other%28asce%299742-597x%281992%298%3A4%28384%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/55884
description abstractThis paper reviews the state of the art of modern mediation processes and presents the experience of integrating mediation and arbitration to resolve disputes in Hong Kong's construction industry. Mediation, the principal mode of resolving disputes in ancient China, may have originated in Confucian philosophy, which stresses harmony and compromise. Resolving construction disputes using an adversarial approach such as arbitration is considered to be in opposition to the maintenance of a harmonious relationship between the two parties. The modern arbitration process may duplicate a litigation proceeding, leading to procrastination and cost escalation. The attention of the paper is focused on various dispute‐resolution alternatives such as mediation, which can provide for both time and cost savings. Besides, it is strongly favored by those in the industry that disputes be resolved within the construction industry itself. Hence, mediation is believed to have promising prospects in this field.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleResolving Construction Disputes by Mediation: Hong Kong Experience
typeJournal Paper
journal volume8
journal issue4
journal titleJournal of Management in Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)9742-597X(1992)8:4(384)
treeJournal of Management in Engineering:;1992:;Volume ( 008 ):;issue: 004
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record