YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Management in Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Management in Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Schedule ‘Games’ People Play, and Some Suggested ‘Remedies’

    Source: Journal of Management in Engineering:;1992:;Volume ( 008 ):;issue: 002
    Author:
    James G. Zack, Jr.,
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)9742-597X(1992)8:2(138)
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: The intended purpose of construction scheduling is to assist with proper planning and coordination of a project. All too frequently, construction schedules are used primarily to help build claims against project owners. Much of the process of “building claims” through the use of schedules involves “schedule gamesmanship.” This paper briefly identifies 14 common schedule games played on public construction projects. The paper also offers 34 suggested “remedies” to help prevent schedule gamesmanship. Some suggested remedies involve changes to contract‐document language and, thus, need to be implemented during the design stage. Other suggested remedies are pragmatic in nature and can be implemented on a daily basis by a knowledgeable construction management team even in the absence of specification language.
    • Download: (1.028Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Schedule ‘Games’ People Play, and Some Suggested ‘Remedies’

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/55860
    Collections
    • Journal of Management in Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorJames G. Zack, Jr.,
    date accessioned2017-05-08T21:33:07Z
    date available2017-05-08T21:33:07Z
    date copyrightApril 1992
    date issued1992
    identifier other%28asce%299742-597x%281992%298%3A2%28138%29.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/55860
    description abstractThe intended purpose of construction scheduling is to assist with proper planning and coordination of a project. All too frequently, construction schedules are used primarily to help build claims against project owners. Much of the process of “building claims” through the use of schedules involves “schedule gamesmanship.” This paper briefly identifies 14 common schedule games played on public construction projects. The paper also offers 34 suggested “remedies” to help prevent schedule gamesmanship. Some suggested remedies involve changes to contract‐document language and, thus, need to be implemented during the design stage. Other suggested remedies are pragmatic in nature and can be implemented on a daily basis by a knowledgeable construction management team even in the absence of specification language.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleSchedule ‘Games’ People Play, and Some Suggested ‘Remedies’
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume8
    journal issue2
    journal titleJournal of Management in Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)9742-597X(1992)8:2(138)
    treeJournal of Management in Engineering:;1992:;Volume ( 008 ):;issue: 002
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian