Show simple item record

contributor authorJames G. Zack, Jr.,
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:33:07Z
date available2017-05-08T21:33:07Z
date copyrightApril 1992
date issued1992
identifier other%28asce%299742-597x%281992%298%3A2%28138%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/55860
description abstractThe intended purpose of construction scheduling is to assist with proper planning and coordination of a project. All too frequently, construction schedules are used primarily to help build claims against project owners. Much of the process of “building claims” through the use of schedules involves “schedule gamesmanship.” This paper briefly identifies 14 common schedule games played on public construction projects. The paper also offers 34 suggested “remedies” to help prevent schedule gamesmanship. Some suggested remedies involve changes to contract‐document language and, thus, need to be implemented during the design stage. Other suggested remedies are pragmatic in nature and can be implemented on a daily basis by a knowledgeable construction management team even in the absence of specification language.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleSchedule ‘Games’ People Play, and Some Suggested ‘Remedies’
typeJournal Paper
journal volume8
journal issue2
journal titleJournal of Management in Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)9742-597X(1992)8:2(138)
treeJournal of Management in Engineering:;1992:;Volume ( 008 ):;issue: 002
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record