| contributor author | Benjamin Levy | |
| contributor author | Richard McCuen | |
| date accessioned | 2017-05-08T21:23:15Z | |
| date available | 2017-05-08T21:23:15Z | |
| date copyright | July 1999 | |
| date issued | 1999 | |
| identifier other | %28asce%291084-0699%281999%294%3A3%28209%29.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/49462 | |
| description abstract | Appropriately designed flood control infrastructure should provide for public safety without wasteful over-design. The design-storm duration is a very significant determinant of the computed peak discharge. Presently, most hydrologic design is based on either the 24-h storm duration or a duration equal to the time of concentration. The professional literature, however, has not included a rational basis for using either of these durations. Since the annual maximum discharges are the basis for flood frequency analyses and ultimately flood risk estimates, it is reasonable that the rainfall duration that causes the annual maximum discharge should provide insight into the most appropriate duration for design storms. Use of the time of concentration suggests that the duration should depend on drainage area. Therefore, a range of watershed areas were used to determine whether or not storm duration depends on watershed size. Analysis of annual maximum discharge data for six Maryland watersheds (1.97 ≤ | |
| publisher | American Society of Civil Engineers | |
| title | Assessment of Storm Duration for Hydrologic Design | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 4 | |
| journal issue | 3 | |
| journal title | Journal of Hydrologic Engineering | |
| identifier doi | 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(1999)4:3(209) | |
| tree | Journal of Hydrologic Engineering:;1999:;Volume ( 004 ):;issue: 003 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext | |