Show simple item record

contributor authorBenjamin Levy
contributor authorRichard McCuen
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:23:15Z
date available2017-05-08T21:23:15Z
date copyrightJuly 1999
date issued1999
identifier other%28asce%291084-0699%281999%294%3A3%28209%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/49462
description abstractAppropriately designed flood control infrastructure should provide for public safety without wasteful over-design. The design-storm duration is a very significant determinant of the computed peak discharge. Presently, most hydrologic design is based on either the 24-h storm duration or a duration equal to the time of concentration. The professional literature, however, has not included a rational basis for using either of these durations. Since the annual maximum discharges are the basis for flood frequency analyses and ultimately flood risk estimates, it is reasonable that the rainfall duration that causes the annual maximum discharge should provide insight into the most appropriate duration for design storms. Use of the time of concentration suggests that the duration should depend on drainage area. Therefore, a range of watershed areas were used to determine whether or not storm duration depends on watershed size. Analysis of annual maximum discharge data for six Maryland watersheds (1.97 ≤
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleAssessment of Storm Duration for Hydrologic Design
typeJournal Paper
journal volume4
journal issue3
journal titleJournal of Hydrologic Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(1999)4:3(209)
treeJournal of Hydrologic Engineering:;1999:;Volume ( 004 ):;issue: 003
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record