YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    “Is That Not Horrific?”—or “You Have Been Warned!” <b><i>Burchell v. Bullard</i></b> and Implications for English Construction Law

    Source: Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice:;2006:;Volume ( 132 ):;issue: 003
    Author:
    Stephen Donohoe
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(2006)132:3(258)
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: In recent times, the cost of litigation has emerged as a serious issue in construction law. This paper examines the approach adopted by the English Courts in the light of recent reforms to the civil justice system and important case law. Important legal decisions indicate a change in judicial attitudes to Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) which was previously thought to be unenforceable by reason of uncertainty until very recently. This paper looks at the development of so-called “ADR law” in the English courts and discusses policy issues behind the recent case of
    • Download: (81.58Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      “Is That Not Horrific?”—or “You Have Been Warned!” <b><i>Burchell v. Bullard</i></b> and Implications for English Construction Law

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/47820
    Collections
    • Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice

    Show full item record

    contributor authorStephen Donohoe
    date accessioned2017-05-08T21:20:42Z
    date available2017-05-08T21:20:42Z
    date copyrightJuly 2006
    date issued2006
    identifier other%28asce%291052-3928%282006%29132%3A3%28258%29.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/47820
    description abstractIn recent times, the cost of litigation has emerged as a serious issue in construction law. This paper examines the approach adopted by the English Courts in the light of recent reforms to the civil justice system and important case law. Important legal decisions indicate a change in judicial attitudes to Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) which was previously thought to be unenforceable by reason of uncertainty until very recently. This paper looks at the development of so-called “ADR law” in the English courts and discusses policy issues behind the recent case of
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    title“Is That Not Horrific?”—or “You Have Been Warned!” Burchell v. Bullard and Implications for English Construction Law
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume132
    journal issue3
    journal titleJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(2006)132:3(258)
    treeJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice:;2006:;Volume ( 132 ):;issue: 003
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian