Show simple item record

contributor authorStephen Donohoe
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:20:42Z
date available2017-05-08T21:20:42Z
date copyrightJuly 2006
date issued2006
identifier other%28asce%291052-3928%282006%29132%3A3%28258%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/47820
description abstractIn recent times, the cost of litigation has emerged as a serious issue in construction law. This paper examines the approach adopted by the English Courts in the light of recent reforms to the civil justice system and important case law. Important legal decisions indicate a change in judicial attitudes to Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) which was previously thought to be unenforceable by reason of uncertainty until very recently. This paper looks at the development of so-called “ADR law” in the English courts and discusses policy issues behind the recent case of
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
title“Is That Not Horrific?”—or “You Have Been Warned!” Burchell v. Bullard and Implications for English Construction Law
typeJournal Paper
journal volume132
journal issue3
journal titleJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(2006)132:3(258)
treeJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice:;2006:;Volume ( 132 ):;issue: 003
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record