YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    An In Situ Examination of Running Specific Prostheses Stiffness Properties

    Source: Journal of Biomechanical Engineering:;2026:;volume( 148 ):;issue:003
    Author:
    Agnew, Paige M.
    ,
    Bennett, Hunter J.
    ,
    Ringleb, Stacie I.
    DOI: 10.1115/1.4070500
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: Abstract. Since the development of running specific prostheses (RSPs) in the 1980s, individuals with lower limb loss have been able to engage in more modes of physical activity including running competitively and recreationally. Researchers have been led to investigate different mechanical properties like stiffness and hysteresis using machine testing. However, machine testing is limited by loading and deformation rates that are well below those recorded during running. The purpose of this investigation is to examine the mechanical properties of RSPs in situ. Three-dimensional motion capture and force platforms were used to record deformation and external loading while two participants ran at their 1-mile pace using their prescribed prosthetic device. Linear and nonlinear prosthetic stiffness and hysteresis were calculated for each trial across loading and restoration phases using the vector magnitudes of three-dimensional force and deformation measured via markers affixed to the prosthesis. Linear stiffness during the loading phase was relatively similar across participants (∼26 kN/m), despite differences in prosthesis type, body mass, and running speeds. However, linear stiffness was reduced by 5–10% during the restoration phase. Overall, both prostheses force–deformation relationships were nonlinear, exhibiting variable stiffness throughout each phase, a crossover point (“pinched hysteresis curve”), and smooth transitions between loading and restoration phases. Machine tested stiffness values from the literature were approximately 5 kN/m lower compared to in situ stiffness values. These findings illustrate the importance of understanding the in situ properties for RSPs, user applications, and clinical recommendations for prostheses prescription.
    • Download: (1.101Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      An In Situ Examination of Running Specific Prostheses Stiffness Properties

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4316504
    Collections
    • Journal of Biomechanical Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorAgnew, Paige M.
    contributor authorBennett, Hunter J.
    contributor authorRingleb, Stacie I.
    date accessioned2026-08-23T08:24:31Z
    date available2026-08-23T08:24:31Z
    date copyright2026/03/01
    date issued2026
    identifier issn0148-0731
    identifier otherbio-25-1164.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4316504
    description abstractAbstract. Since the development of running specific prostheses (RSPs) in the 1980s, individuals with lower limb loss have been able to engage in more modes of physical activity including running competitively and recreationally. Researchers have been led to investigate different mechanical properties like stiffness and hysteresis using machine testing. However, machine testing is limited by loading and deformation rates that are well below those recorded during running. The purpose of this investigation is to examine the mechanical properties of RSPs in situ. Three-dimensional motion capture and force platforms were used to record deformation and external loading while two participants ran at their 1-mile pace using their prescribed prosthetic device. Linear and nonlinear prosthetic stiffness and hysteresis were calculated for each trial across loading and restoration phases using the vector magnitudes of three-dimensional force and deformation measured via markers affixed to the prosthesis. Linear stiffness during the loading phase was relatively similar across participants (∼26 kN/m), despite differences in prosthesis type, body mass, and running speeds. However, linear stiffness was reduced by 5–10% during the restoration phase. Overall, both prostheses force–deformation relationships were nonlinear, exhibiting variable stiffness throughout each phase, a crossover point (“pinched hysteresis curve”), and smooth transitions between loading and restoration phases. Machine tested stiffness values from the literature were approximately 5 kN/m lower compared to in situ stiffness values. These findings illustrate the importance of understanding the in situ properties for RSPs, user applications, and clinical recommendations for prostheses prescription.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleAn In Situ Examination of Running Specific Prostheses Stiffness Properties
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume148
    journal issue3
    journal titleJournal of Biomechanical Engineering
    identifier doi10.1115/1.4070500
    treeJournal of Biomechanical Engineering:;2026:;volume( 148 ):;issue:003
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian