Show simple item record

contributor authorAgnew, Paige M.
contributor authorBennett, Hunter J.
contributor authorRingleb, Stacie I.
date accessioned2026-08-23T08:24:31Z
date available2026-08-23T08:24:31Z
date copyright2026/03/01
date issued2026
identifier issn0148-0731
identifier otherbio-25-1164.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4316504
description abstractAbstract. Since the development of running specific prostheses (RSPs) in the 1980s, individuals with lower limb loss have been able to engage in more modes of physical activity including running competitively and recreationally. Researchers have been led to investigate different mechanical properties like stiffness and hysteresis using machine testing. However, machine testing is limited by loading and deformation rates that are well below those recorded during running. The purpose of this investigation is to examine the mechanical properties of RSPs in situ. Three-dimensional motion capture and force platforms were used to record deformation and external loading while two participants ran at their 1-mile pace using their prescribed prosthetic device. Linear and nonlinear prosthetic stiffness and hysteresis were calculated for each trial across loading and restoration phases using the vector magnitudes of three-dimensional force and deformation measured via markers affixed to the prosthesis. Linear stiffness during the loading phase was relatively similar across participants (∼26 kN/m), despite differences in prosthesis type, body mass, and running speeds. However, linear stiffness was reduced by 5–10% during the restoration phase. Overall, both prostheses force–deformation relationships were nonlinear, exhibiting variable stiffness throughout each phase, a crossover point (“pinched hysteresis curve”), and smooth transitions between loading and restoration phases. Machine tested stiffness values from the literature were approximately 5 kN/m lower compared to in situ stiffness values. These findings illustrate the importance of understanding the in situ properties for RSPs, user applications, and clinical recommendations for prostheses prescription.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleAn In Situ Examination of Running Specific Prostheses Stiffness Properties
typeJournal Paper
journal volume148
journal issue3
journal titleJournal of Biomechanical Engineering
identifier doi10.1115/1.4070500
treeJournal of Biomechanical Engineering:;2026:;volume( 148 ):;issue:003
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record