| contributor author | Mohamed Abd-Elfatah Diwan | |
| contributor author | Sahar Abd Elfatah | |
| date accessioned | 2022-01-30T21:01:29Z | |
| date available | 2022-01-30T21:01:29Z | |
| date issued | 5/1/2020 12:00:00 AM | |
| identifier other | %28ASCE%29SC.1943-5576.0000477.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4267522 | |
| description abstract | Heavy machinery that undergoes significant impact in its lifetime requires support and a system that can resist dynamic forces and the resulting vibrations. In this context, this technical paper reports a case study on a machine featuring hydraulic steel sheet shears and two hammers. The machine foundation of the hydraulic steel sheet shears was fixed to a concrete foundation using chemically bonded anchor bolts of a certain length and diameter. A short time after the machine had begun operating, shear failure of the anchor bolts occurred. These chemically bonded anchor bolts were then replaced with T-shaped anchor bolts of the same length and diameter, which functioned well. Two hammers were fixed in cast using J-shaped anchor bolts. The J- and T-shaped anchor bolts functioned well in the machine for over 10 years. From field studies and years of successful construction practices, traditional J- and T-shaped anchor bolts fixed with reinforcement of concrete foundations are recommended for fixing machines with impact loads and are superior to chemically bonded anchor bolts. | |
| publisher | ASCE | |
| title | Chemical-Bonded Anchor Bolts versus Traditional J and T Anchor Bolts Used in Machine Foundations | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 25 | |
| journal issue | 2 | |
| journal title | Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction | |
| identifier doi | 10.1061/(ASCE)SC.1943-5576.0000477 | |
| page | 5 | |
| tree | Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction:;2020:;Volume ( 025 ):;issue: 002 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext | |