YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Structural Design and Construction Practice
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Structural Design and Construction Practice
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Chemical-Bonded Anchor Bolts versus Traditional J and T Anchor Bolts Used in Machine Foundations

    Source: Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction:;2020:;Volume ( 025 ):;issue: 002
    Author:
    Mohamed Abd-Elfatah Diwan
    ,
    Sahar Abd Elfatah
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)SC.1943-5576.0000477
    Publisher: ASCE
    Abstract: Heavy machinery that undergoes significant impact in its lifetime requires support and a system that can resist dynamic forces and the resulting vibrations. In this context, this technical paper reports a case study on a machine featuring hydraulic steel sheet shears and two hammers. The machine foundation of the hydraulic steel sheet shears was fixed to a concrete foundation using chemically bonded anchor bolts of a certain length and diameter. A short time after the machine had begun operating, shear failure of the anchor bolts occurred. These chemically bonded anchor bolts were then replaced with T-shaped anchor bolts of the same length and diameter, which functioned well. Two hammers were fixed in cast using J-shaped anchor bolts. The J- and T-shaped anchor bolts functioned well in the machine for over 10 years. From field studies and years of successful construction practices, traditional J- and T-shaped anchor bolts fixed with reinforcement of concrete foundations are recommended for fixing machines with impact loads and are superior to chemically bonded anchor bolts.
    • Download: (262.9Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Chemical-Bonded Anchor Bolts versus Traditional J and T Anchor Bolts Used in Machine Foundations

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4267522
    Collections
    • Journal of Structural Design and Construction Practice

    Show full item record

    contributor authorMohamed Abd-Elfatah Diwan
    contributor authorSahar Abd Elfatah
    date accessioned2022-01-30T21:01:29Z
    date available2022-01-30T21:01:29Z
    date issued5/1/2020 12:00:00 AM
    identifier other%28ASCE%29SC.1943-5576.0000477.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4267522
    description abstractHeavy machinery that undergoes significant impact in its lifetime requires support and a system that can resist dynamic forces and the resulting vibrations. In this context, this technical paper reports a case study on a machine featuring hydraulic steel sheet shears and two hammers. The machine foundation of the hydraulic steel sheet shears was fixed to a concrete foundation using chemically bonded anchor bolts of a certain length and diameter. A short time after the machine had begun operating, shear failure of the anchor bolts occurred. These chemically bonded anchor bolts were then replaced with T-shaped anchor bolts of the same length and diameter, which functioned well. Two hammers were fixed in cast using J-shaped anchor bolts. The J- and T-shaped anchor bolts functioned well in the machine for over 10 years. From field studies and years of successful construction practices, traditional J- and T-shaped anchor bolts fixed with reinforcement of concrete foundations are recommended for fixing machines with impact loads and are superior to chemically bonded anchor bolts.
    publisherASCE
    titleChemical-Bonded Anchor Bolts versus Traditional J and T Anchor Bolts Used in Machine Foundations
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume25
    journal issue2
    journal titlePractice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)SC.1943-5576.0000477
    page5
    treePractice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction:;2020:;Volume ( 025 ):;issue: 002
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian