Show simple item record

contributor authorMohamed Abd-Elfatah Diwan
contributor authorSahar Abd Elfatah
date accessioned2022-01-30T21:01:29Z
date available2022-01-30T21:01:29Z
date issued5/1/2020 12:00:00 AM
identifier other%28ASCE%29SC.1943-5576.0000477.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4267522
description abstractHeavy machinery that undergoes significant impact in its lifetime requires support and a system that can resist dynamic forces and the resulting vibrations. In this context, this technical paper reports a case study on a machine featuring hydraulic steel sheet shears and two hammers. The machine foundation of the hydraulic steel sheet shears was fixed to a concrete foundation using chemically bonded anchor bolts of a certain length and diameter. A short time after the machine had begun operating, shear failure of the anchor bolts occurred. These chemically bonded anchor bolts were then replaced with T-shaped anchor bolts of the same length and diameter, which functioned well. Two hammers were fixed in cast using J-shaped anchor bolts. The J- and T-shaped anchor bolts functioned well in the machine for over 10 years. From field studies and years of successful construction practices, traditional J- and T-shaped anchor bolts fixed with reinforcement of concrete foundations are recommended for fixing machines with impact loads and are superior to chemically bonded anchor bolts.
publisherASCE
titleChemical-Bonded Anchor Bolts versus Traditional J and T Anchor Bolts Used in Machine Foundations
typeJournal Paper
journal volume25
journal issue2
journal titlePractice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)SC.1943-5576.0000477
page5
treePractice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction:;2020:;Volume ( 025 ):;issue: 002
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record