| contributor author | Meluso, John | |
| contributor author | Austin-Breneman, Jesse | |
| date accessioned | 2019-02-28T11:03:41Z | |
| date available | 2019-02-28T11:03:41Z | |
| date copyright | 9/18/2018 12:00:00 AM | |
| date issued | 2018 | |
| identifier issn | 1050-0472 | |
| identifier other | md_140_12_121101.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4252233 | |
| description abstract | Parameter estimates in large-scale complex engineered systems (LaCES) affect system evolution, yet can be difficult and expensive to test. Systems engineering uses analytical methods to reduce uncertainty, but a growing body of work from other disciplines indicates that cognitive heuristics also affect decision-making. Results from interviews with expert aerospace practitioners suggest that engineers bias estimation strategies. Practitioners reaffirmed known system features and posited that engineers may bias estimation methods as a negotiation and resource conservation strategy. Specifically, participants reported that some systems engineers “game the system” by biasing requirements to counteract subsystem estimation biases. An agent-based model (ABM) simulation which recreates these characteristics is presented. Model results suggest that system-level estimate accuracy and uncertainty depend on subsystem behavior and are not significantly affected by systems engineers' “gaming” strategy. | |
| publisher | The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) | |
| title | Gaming the System: An Agent-Based Model of Estimation Strategies and their Effects on System Performance | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 140 | |
| journal issue | 12 | |
| journal title | Journal of Mechanical Design | |
| identifier doi | 10.1115/1.4039494 | |
| journal fristpage | 121101 | |
| journal lastpage | 121101-9 | |
| tree | Journal of Mechanical Design:;2018:;volume( 140 ):;issue: 012 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext | |