Show simple item record

contributor authorMeluso, John
contributor authorAustin-Breneman, Jesse
date accessioned2019-02-28T11:03:41Z
date available2019-02-28T11:03:41Z
date copyright9/18/2018 12:00:00 AM
date issued2018
identifier issn1050-0472
identifier othermd_140_12_121101.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4252233
description abstractParameter estimates in large-scale complex engineered systems (LaCES) affect system evolution, yet can be difficult and expensive to test. Systems engineering uses analytical methods to reduce uncertainty, but a growing body of work from other disciplines indicates that cognitive heuristics also affect decision-making. Results from interviews with expert aerospace practitioners suggest that engineers bias estimation strategies. Practitioners reaffirmed known system features and posited that engineers may bias estimation methods as a negotiation and resource conservation strategy. Specifically, participants reported that some systems engineers “game the system” by biasing requirements to counteract subsystem estimation biases. An agent-based model (ABM) simulation which recreates these characteristics is presented. Model results suggest that system-level estimate accuracy and uncertainty depend on subsystem behavior and are not significantly affected by systems engineers' “gaming” strategy.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleGaming the System: An Agent-Based Model of Estimation Strategies and their Effects on System Performance
typeJournal Paper
journal volume140
journal issue12
journal titleJournal of Mechanical Design
identifier doi10.1115/1.4039494
journal fristpage121101
journal lastpage121101-9
treeJournal of Mechanical Design:;2018:;volume( 140 ):;issue: 012
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record